AB 2943 Silences Ministers on Biblical Discussion of Sexual Issues

If AB 2943 passes you will be able to discuss the “need” for same sex” marriage, gender “fluidity” and suggest people read studies and reports on the subject.  But, if you are a Minister, and oppose same sex marriage, believe there are only two genders, regardless of surgery and medicine, and tell a young congregant to read the Bible or read studies and reports on the emotional cost of confused gender identify, it would be a crime.  You need to know this since today the legislature is going to hold hearings on this one sided use of the First Amendment.

“The chair of the California LGBT Caucus recently introduced a bill to outlaw Christians and others with a Biblical view of sexuality from helping people with unwanted same-sex desires or gender identity confusion.  Assemblyman Evan Low’s bill, AB 2943 , declares “advertising, offering to engage in, or engaging in sexual orientation change efforts with an individual” as illegal under state’s consumer fraud law.

The implications of this legislation spread far beyond regulating the type of counseling offered by licensed counselors, who are already banned from helping minors with unwanted same-sex attractions. Several legal experts have confirmed that this bill targets the ability of religious non-profits, churches, and pastors from teaching and practicing their faith regarding sexual orientation and gender.

While the bill is about sexual orientation discussions, it is really about using government to bully people into silence on an issue.  No longer will all sides be allowed to be heard on this issue—it is like Planned Parenthood showing up in a class and telling the wonders of killing a baby and those who believe in the sanctity of life are not allowed the same forum.  Call your Assembly member today—keep the First Amendment for everyone.

120px-Gateway_Church_NRH

New CA Bill Outlaws Helping Anyone with Unwanted Same-Sex Desires or Gender Confusion

By Greg Burt, California Family Council,  3/14/18

 

The chair of the California LGBT Caucus recently introduced a bill to outlaw Christians and others with a Biblical view of sexuality from helping people with unwanted same-sex desires or gender identity confusion.  Assemblyman Evan Low’s bill, AB 2943 , declares “advertising, offering to engage in, or engaging in sexual orientation change efforts with an individual” as illegal under state’s consumer fraud law.

The implications of this legislation spread far beyond regulating the type of counseling offered by licensed counselors, who are already banned from helping minors with unwanted same-sex attractions. Several legal experts have confirmed that this bill targets the ability of religious non-profits, churches, and pastors from teaching and practicing their faith regarding sexual orientation and gender.

“The language used in this bill casts a wide net calculated to entangle religious institutions and ministers,” said Kevin Snider, Chief Counsel Pacific Justice Institute.  “Any exchange of money for goods or services that provide a biblical perspective on the power of the Gospel to deliver from certain types of sexual sin springs the law and entraps the ministry.”

The bill would also ban books from being sold in California that tell people to trust in the power of Jesus Christ and His Gospel to help them change their same-sex attraction or gender dysphoria, according to Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF).

“California AB 2943 makes it unlawful for any person to sell books, counseling services, or anything else that helps someone overcome unwanted same-sex attraction or gender identity confusion,” said ADF Attorney Matt Sharp. “As a result, it could be a violation if a pastor encourages a congregant to visit the church book store to purchase books that help people address sexual issues, perhaps including the Bible itself, which teaches about the importance of sexual purity within the confines of marriage between a man and woman.” (Read complete ADF bill analysis here)

Alliance Defending Freedom is so concerned about this bill, that they flew Sharp out to California’s capitol last Friday for television and radio interviews, and to speak to legislative offices, warning them about the implications of this bill.

Joining him were several psychologists and a medical doctor who told legislative staff how this bill would prevent them from providing services to clients seeking their help.

One of those psychologists, Christopher Rosik, Ph.D., works with the Alliance for Therapeutic Choice and Scientific Integrity, an organization dedicated to preserving the right of individuals to obtain the services of a therapist to help them with unwanted same-sex attractions. He presented California legislative offices with a journal article he authored rebutting critics who use “incomplete and dishonest presentation of the scientific record” to discredit this type of therapy. The article also corrects the “false caricatures of licensed therapists who do this work.”

“The professional associations are making moral and philosophical statements here, not
scientific ones,” Rosik stated, explaining why many profession associations oppose counseling to change sexual orientation.  “They are blurring the line between science and scientism. Science is simply a methodology, a way of discerning what “is” through empirical research and replication. Scientism is a form of worldview, structured not unlike a religious belief system, which brings certain values and beliefs to the scientific endeavor, and this in turn impacts how findings are interpreted.”

Then Laura Haynes, Ph.D., licensed psychologist and Chair of Research and Legislative Policy for the National Task Force for Therapy Equality also defended sexual orientation and gender identity therapy. She presented legislative staff with evidence right out of the APA (American Psychological Association) Handbook of Sexuality and Psychology that states that sexual and gender variations are not simply biologically determined, and can be influenced by sexual abuse.

According to Haynes, if AB 2943 is approved, victims of sexual abuse can no longer get counseling for “unwanted emotional and sexual ties to their abuser” if their abuser is the same sex as the victim. Ironically if the abuser is the opposite sex, the victim can get counseling. In the same way men who struggle with desires to have sex with little boys, won’t be allowed to get counseling to change these unwanted desires, but they can if they are attracted to little girls.

“Our clients have the same freedom and the right as everyone else to resolve unwanted feelings, love who they want, and choose their gender identity. No one should take that away from them,” Haynes stated in her fact sheet titled, “What Happens When Therapy is Banned?” “Some want to live and love according to their religious faith. No one should deny them that right.”

About Stephen Frank

Stephen Frank is the publisher and editor of California Political News and Views. He speaks all over California and appears as a guest on several radio shows each week. He has also served as a guest host on radio talk shows. He is a fulltime political consultant.

Comments

  1. CA needs to be sued NOW and stop this crap !! It’s illegal and they are going to push the envelope as far as possible unless we just stomp on the legislature’s illegal activities.

  2. tomsquawk says

    Forget this proposal. If you don’t want to hear it go to a LGBT church and leave it at that. Or ask a Muslim. Problem solved.

  3. How can counseling that is voluntary and not purchased, or agreed to be purchased violate AB2943?
    The bill specifically prohibits only professional services designated as the agreement of a consumer and a provider.
    The bill is bad enough, violating the professional expertise of any provider who has a LGBTQ….. patient who seeks help with their dyspeptic sinful lifestyle. But if no money or financial consideration is asked for the service then there is no violation of the law.

    • It’s a ‘foot in the door’ so to speak. Once that happens the defenders of this scant 3-4% of our nation’s population will start pushing more, more and MORE until NO one will be permitted to even say one word in opposition to LBGT*** life-styles nor be able to say or insinuate in ANY WAY that these aberrations are anything BUT normal. They want to shut up any and ALL words of disagreement period. And all of that in the name of their FAUX ‘tolerance’.

    • Think about transactions made in churches. Churches hold conferences. Churches sell books. Churches pay for speakers. That same goes for Christian schools. Students pay fees and those fees are used to hear professors views on these topics. It isn’t just counseling. Any practice that seeks to change sexual orientation is illegal. Any advertising that changes is possible is illegal. If they wanted only professional services effected, then they would have put this law in the professional code, but they put it in the consumer fraud law. Big difference.

  4. This is getting pretty Low, even for a Low.

  5. This issue will most likely HAVE to go before the Supreme Court. California lawmakers could care less about normalcy or religious freedom. This is about BRAINWASHING and preventing anyone who might be able to stop it from happening from being permitted to do so. This is what our nation is coming to… disgusting!

  6. Anthony Barber says

    This is PURE FACSISM! It is an in your face violation of the First Amendment! Don’t let them get away with it my fellow Americans in California. FIGHT THIS! I’m addition, VOTE OUT anyone who supports it!

  7. Freedom of speech
    No gag orders
    Freedom of religion

  8. Freedom says

    It is a violation, of our first amendment rights people. I say that the US supreme Court deny California this ban, and over turn it.

Trackbacks

  1. […] will lead. And significantly, one parallel between AB 2943 and Nazi Germany is glaringly evident: the censorship of books! Without question, the militant LGBT lobby is becoming more and more coercive and […]

Speak Your Mind

*