How the Elections Signaled a Breakthrough for Multi-ethnic Conservatism

To some the color of the skin of a person is more important than their experience, quality and values.  So, when people of color are elected as Republicans some see this as a matter of race.  Instead this should be seen that people of all races are qualified to hold public office.  The idea that conservatives are racist, because conservative of color did not in such large number in the past get elected to office.  Now, in California the fact that the NRCC and RNC poured millions into four races, makes it look like something it isn’t.

One thing all the congressional winners had in common was their support of President Trump–against the strong advice of the Chair of the California Republican Party.

At the same time, four candidates, who could have won, but did not receive support from the NRCC, the RNC or the CRP, lost, though they all received more than 40% of the vote—without any help.  Imagine if they had help!

How the Elections Signaled a Breakthrough for Multi-ethnic Conservatism

NEW YORK, NY – MAY 03: Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump and his wife Melania Trump arrive to speak to supporters at Trump Tower in Manhattan following his victory in the Indiana primary on May 03, 2016 in New York City. Trump beat rival Ted Cruz decisively in a contest that many analysts believe was the last chance for any other Republican candidate to catch Trump in the delegate count. (Photo by Spencer Platt/Getty Images)

Rachel del Guidice, Daily Signal,  11/29/20    

President Donald Trump’s getting a greater share of the black vote than the average Republican candidate and California voters’ rejection of affirmative action, an effort led by Asian Americans, are being seen as hopeful signs for a multi-ethnic conservatism.

“So, what you’re seeing is people realizing that their lot is with an American way, a seeking of an American system,” Francisco “Quico” Canseco, director of the Election Protection Project at the Texas Public Policy Foundation, said at a recent webinar hosted by The Heritage Foundation. 

“With Donald Trump, I think what happened is that an appeal to a lot of these people, that there was a certain sense of machismo, and in the president in getting things done and really serving the people with palpable, tactile facts of what he did on the ground,” said Canseco, a former congressman from Texas. 

The Nov. 17 briefing, “Multi-ethnic Conservatism: Americans With Diverse Backgrounds Seek to Conserve What’s Good About America,” was hosted by Angela Sailor, vice president of The Heritage Foundation’s Feulner Institute.

Ying Ma, another presenter, was the communications director for the successful “No on Prop 16” campaign, in which California voters this month rejected Proposition 16, which would have reinstated affirmative action in state law.

The ballot measure would have repealed Proposition 209, a law enacted by California voters in 1996 that banned affirmative action.

Proposition 16 would have permitted universities, community colleges, and other public institutions to take into account race, gender, and ethnicity when hiring, awarding contracts, and accepting students into schools.

Opponents said that the rejection of Proposition 16 by 57% of the vote was monumental because voters saw the failure of identity politics.

“In many ways, this was a rejection of a number of long-standing Asian-American groups that have for decades failed so spectacularly at serving the people they claim to represent,” Ma said, adding:

These groups didn’t really see the language of the people that they claim to represent … . And they just very much thought that they knew what was best for the people they claim to represent. And this was a resounding rejection of those types of so-called civil rights organizations. 

Ma, a Chinese immigrant to America and author of the autobiographical “Chinese Girl in the Ghetto,” said that Asian Americans are seeing through rhetoric that is ultimately racist. 

“It didn’t escape people that some of the people … who were promoting racial preferences were some of the most racist people out there,” she said. 

Lenny McAllister, chief executive officer of the Pennsylvania Coalition of Public Charter Schools and senior fellow at the Commonwealth Foundation, said that voting in 2020 for African Americans became more about policy, and less about personality. 

“African-American voters started making choices on policies,” McAllister said. “They started looking and saying, ‘Oh, my local public schools closed. And what options do my kids have to have continuity of education?’

“They said the same thing about their jobs, the same thing about their society being open,” he added. “You can get the resources that my family needs. And when they are looking at that, without being forced into a straight-ticket option, they start choosing and splitting their ticket.”

Black voters have long voted overwhelmingly for Democrats, but in the Nov. 3 presidential election, Trump received 8 percent of the black vote (12% among black men), which is roughly a 2 percentage-point increase over his 2016 figures, according to AP VoteCast.  

But McAllister cautioned that conservatives have their work cut out for them if they hope to engage more of the African-American population. 

“At this moment, because of the pandemic, because of the election, because of the blowback, which was not just 2020, but going as far back as Ferguson [Missouri], even before that, people are looking for new solutions, and we have solutions for them,” he said, adding: 

This is a time to reinvigorate our efforts in regards to tweaking how we articulate our proposals and making sure that we have the partnerships in place, both the traditional ones and the American constituencies that we’re going to be dealing with to ensure that people get the solutions that they need.  

Canseco said the result is that minorities are more fully embracing what it means to be American. 

“Going forward, I think that what you’ve got is an awakening of a population that was otherwise somewhat controlled—even though, I don’t mean to sound insulting—being told that one side is just a lot meaner and not as kind as another.

“And I see the … idea being that, they are now beginning to embrace more fully of their Americanism,” he said.  

About Stephen Frank

Stephen Frank is the publisher and editor of California Political News and Views. He speaks all over California and appears as a guest on several radio shows each week. He has also served as a guest host on radio talk shows. He is a fulltime political consultant.

Comments

  1. Is CA more conservative than people think? In the November 3 election, the CAGOP urged a “NO” vote on nine of 12 Propositions (YES of Props 20 and 22, no position on Prop 19) whereas the CADEM’s urged a “YES” vote on ten of 12 Propositions (NO on Props 20 and 22). So how did the vote go? Voters voted YES on five Propositions and NO on seven others; agreeing with the CAGOP on six and the CADEMs on five.
    As far as the Dems claiming to be “the party of the people”, their recommendations of “YES” on Prop 16, Affirmative Action (defeated 57.2%/42..8)%, Prop 23, Dialysis Clinics (defeated 63.4%/36.6%) and “NO” on Prop 22, App-based Drivers (passed 58.6%/41.4%) shows just how out of step they are with the “people” they claim to represent.

Speak Your Mind

*