Lincoln Project Picks Up Overseas Business: Oppose Netanyahu of Israel

First they used Democrat/Soros money to defeat President Trump and Republican U.S. Senators.  Now, using Democrat money they will try to destabilize Israel.  They will try to defeat Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

“The Associated Press confirmed that Steve Schmidt, Rick Wilson, Stuart Stevens, and Reed Galen were recently hired to advise Gideon Sa’ar, a Netanyahu rival who left the Likud Party in 2019 after an unsuccessful campaign for party leadership. Sa’ar, who founded the New Hope party in December 2020, has accused Netanyahu of being too conciliatory to Palestinian interests.

Israel’s legislative elections will take place on March 23.

It is not immediately clear how advising Sa’ar is relevant to the Lincoln Project’s stated mission of defeating “President Trump and Trumpism at the ballot box” and “holding accountable those who would violate their oaths to the Constitution and would put others before Americans.”

Thanks to the California Republican Party not taking action against another of the Lincoln Project founders, Mike Madrid, they are going to “primary”—using Democrat money La Malfa, McClintock, Garcia, Obernolte, Issa, Nunes, McCarthy, Kim, and Steele.

Lincoln Project Picks Up Overseas Business

PAC founders target Netanyahu

Andrew Stiles, Washington Free Beacon,  1/18/21 

The experienced political grifters who founded the Lincoln Project aren’t going to let Donald Trump’s imminent departure or the end of the 2020 U.S. election cycle impede their cash flow.

Four founding members of the controversial super PAC, which recently parted ways with cofounder John Weaver after dozens of young men accused him of sexually inappropriate behavior, are taking their talents to Israel in an effort to make money by advising one of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s opponents in the Jewish state’s upcoming elections.

The Associated Press confirmed that Steve Schmidt, Rick Wilson, Stuart Stevens, and Reed Galen were recently hired to advise Gideon Sa’ar, a Netanyahu rival who left the Likud Party in 2019 after an unsuccessful campaign for party leadership. Sa’ar, who founded the New Hope party in December 2020, has accused Netanyahu of being too conciliatory to Palestinian interests.

Israel’s legislative elections will take place on March 23.

It is not immediately clear how advising Sa’ar is relevant to the Lincoln Project’s stated mission of defeating “President Trump and Trumpism at the ballot box” and “holding accountable those who would violate their oaths to the Constitution and would put others before Americans.”

The Lincoln Project has yet to issue a substantive response to John Weaver’s alleged victims, some of whom claim that the Lincoln Project cofounder “groomed” them by offering lucrative career opportunities in exchange for sex and emailed them unsolicited photos of his genitals.

Late last week, Weaver acknowledged making his alleged victims “uncomfortable through my messages that I viewed as consensual mutual conversations” but dismissed accusations of more serious wrongdoing as “smears” motivated by political opposition.

Colman: HOT PASTRAMI VS. SURFING

Richard Colman, the author of this article has a Ph.D.  Now I know why and how he got it.  Richard may have suggested the most brilliant plan EVER to depopulate California.  We already have large corporations and very rich people leaving the State.  Due to bad roads, high cost of living, failed schools that indoctrinate instead of education, the middle class is fleeing as fast as they can get a U-Haul reservation.

And the way to cut demand is for California to continue to do what it has been doing for decades:  raise taxes.

California already has the highest state sales tax in the nation (7.25 percent).  Local communities can add to this tax rate.  In one California city, Santa Fe Springs, the tax rate has been pushed from the 7.25 percent state rate to a local rate equaling 10.50 percent.

In 2012, California’s voters, under Proposition 30, raised the sales tax and the income tax.  When Proposition 30 did not bring in the expected revenue soon enough, the state’s voters, in 2016, passed Proposition 55, an extension of   Maybe we solve our overcrowding in hospitals and schools, our lack of housing with a simple plan to tax people to death in California.  If they refuse to die, they pass a bill giving them the free use of a U-Haul for 30 days—that will get a lot of folks out of the State.Proposition 30’s tax hikes.

California now has the nation’s highest — or second highest — tax rate for gasoline.

The good news is that the Sacramento Democrats and Newsom already are working on this.  So far over $10 billion in new taxes are being proposed—in the middle of an economic Depression.

HOT PASTRAMI VS. SURFING

By Richard Colman, Exclusive to the California Political News and Views  1/22/21

They have great hot pastrami sandwiches and kosher pickles.  We have surfing, beautiful beaches, and — in coastal areas — no snow.

“They” refers to New York State.  “We” refers to California.

Until around 1963, New York State had more people than any other American state.  Then everything changed.  During that same era, California surpassed New York State in population.  Specifically, California suddenly had more residents than New York State’s 17 million people.

And California’s growth did not stop.  By 2020, California’s population reached 40 million, more people than reside in all of Canada.

But, with excessive growth, problems emerged.

For the last several years, prices for residential real estate in California have skyrocketed.  A house in a decent neighborhood that cost $25,000 in 1960 now can cost $2.5 million or more.

Some say that California has a “housing crisis.”  When successfully campaigning for governor of California in 2018, Gavin Newsom promised to build 3.5 million new housing units by 2025.  Newsom wanted a “Marshall Plan” for affordable housing.  (The Marshall Plan was a United States government plan to rebuild Europe after the devastation of World War II.)

In recent weeks, Newsom has allegedly called for legislation to preempt local communities’ zoning ordinances — ordinances that favor the existence and development of single, detached family homes.  The governor’s plan calls for giving the State of California the mandate to construct high-rise, high-density housing (often called stack-and pack housing) in local communities where the state deems such housing is needed.

The core of California’s housing problem is excessive demand for housing.

So instead of government’s working to increase the supply of housing, why not go in the opposite direction:  cut the demand for housing?

Simple, elementary economics shows that demand for housing can be cut.

And the way to cut demand is for Califoria to continue to do what it has been doing for decades:  raise taxes.

California already has the highest state sales tax in the nation (7.25 percent).  Local communities can add to this tax rate.  In one California city, Santa Fe Springs, the tax rate has been pushed from the 7.25 percent state rate to a local rate equaling 10.50 percent.

In 2012, California’s voters, under Proposition 30, raised the sales tax and the income tax.  When Proposition 30 did not bring in the expected revenue soon enough, the state’s voters, in 2016, passed Proposition 55, an extension of Proposition 30’s tax hikes.

California now has the nation’s highest — or second highest — tax rate for gasoline.

For the state’s personal income tax, the top bracket is 13.3 percent, the highest top bracket in the nation.

With such high taxation already in place, California should have no problem raising property taxes, personal-income taxes, business taxes, and capital gains taxes even more.

Under a plan for higher taxation, individuals and business will be forced to leave California.  In fact, citing high taxation levels, such California-based firms as Hewlett Packard, Oracle, Charles Schwab, and Tesla (the electric car company) have announced plans to leave California.  Others firms have already left the state or closed down.  When businesses leave, their employees will also leave or possibly face joblessness.

California, with its beautiful Yosemite Valley, redwood trees, scenic coastal highway, and beautiful beaches, should abandon plans to construct additional housing.

With higher taxes, people and businesses will automatically leave.

Who knows?  With sufficient higher taxes, California’s population may drop back to 17 million people.

Failed San Diego Superintendent Appointed by Harris/Biden Administration to Dept. of Education

One out of four minority students are failing in San Diego classrooms.  To remedy this they change the grading system so no one fails, allows bullying in the classroom and made the classrooms and campuses dangerous.  Instead of quality education she preferred indoctrination

““And she was ok. Not great, but just ok. For every time she stuck up for teachers or started a new beneficial program she also refused to expel dangerous students that put others at severe risk and didn’t fix problems at schools despite many lagging behind. Look up any recap of her tenure, because it’s always a ‘some good, more bad’ kind of situation. She also pushed for better results for minority students and non-English speakers learning English, which is noble and honestly a good thing, but her efforts really just moved them around too much. Why do you think that nearly one out of four minority students was failing or nearly failing under her watch? They had to install the new grading program to cover up her negligence. And they blamed the poor grades partially on racism.”

Instead of taking responsibility for her failures, like a radical Progressive, she blames “racism”.  She has stated on more than one occasion that being white is proof of racism.  Now she is joining the Biden Administration—in the primary Kamala Harris called Joe Biden a racist—now this is proof.

San Diego School Superintendent Cindy Marten Named As Biden’s Next Deputy Education Secretary

Marten leaves behind controversial tenure as SDUSD Superintendent

By Evan Symon, California Globe,  1/18/21 

San Diego United School District (SDUSD) Superintendent Cindy Marten was named by President-elect Joe Biden Monday, as the next United States Deputy Secretary of Education.

The University of Wisconsin-La Crosse and UC San Diego-educated Marten has worked as an educator in some capacity in the San Diego-area since 1989. After beginning as a teacher and literacy specialist in nearby Poway, Marten steadily moved up. In the 90’s, she began a ten-year stint at Central Elementary in the SDUSD system where she began taking a hands on approach at the school, such as introducing a bi-literacy program and adding benefits such as daycare for teachers at the school.

These programs won her several stints as vice principal and principal at other  schools in the SDUSD system until 2013. That year, she was chosen as the next Superintendent by a unanimous Board of Education vote. Since then she has run the district, even winning a few awards along the way such as the 2018 San Diego Business Journal Businesswoman of the Year award.

If approved by Congress in the coming months, Marten would serve in the Department of Education directly under incoming Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona, who was recently elevated by Biden from his Connecticut Commissioner of Education position.

In a statement, Marten said that she was honored and would accept the nomination.

“I’m honored by the nomination,” said Marten on Monday. “Therefore, I will be leaving my post as your Superintendent, following confirmation by the United States Senate.

“I have already spoken with Secretary-designate Miguel Cardona, and I have never been more optimistic about the future of the American education system. I have also spoken with the San Diego Unified Board of Education to ensure a seamless transition. Everyone remains focused on providing our students with a full recovery following the COVID-19 pandemic.”

Marten proceeded to thank San Diego, students, parents, fellow educators, and other education employees and administrators for getting her to this point.

Criticism of Marten

However, Marten’s selection faced criticism on Monday, with many pointing out that, under her tenure, SDSDU has seen a growing number of schools making the states ‘worst performing school’ list, a rising number of failing students, and has had such a large number of failing minority students that they had to completely overhaul their grading process in a controversial decision that, among other things, will no longer penalize students for missing homework, quizzes, or tests.

“She’s been, I’ll say, controversial, since day one,” noted SDUSD teacher ‘Alice’, who only agreed to a Globe interview under anonymity. “You know she was just picked. There wasn’t even a public search or anything. Some knew of her, but that was about it.

“And she was ok. Not great, but just ok. For every time she stuck up for teachers or started a new beneficial program she also refused to expel dangerous students that put others at severe risk and didn’t fix problems at schools despite many lagging behind. Look up any recap of her tenure, because it’s always a ‘some good, more bad’ kind of situation. She also pushed for better results for minority students and non-English speakers learning English, which is noble and honestly a good thing, but her efforts really just moved them around too much. Why do you think that nearly one out of four minority students was failing or nearly failing under her watch? They had to install the new grading program to cover up her negligence. And they blamed the poor grades partially on racism.

“Many I know are glad that she’s out of San Diego but it’s sort of a catch 22 now that she is one of the top education leaders in the country now.”

Marten is expected to be nominated by the Senate in Washington soon.

Return of the Country Club Republicans

Who are the current Country Club Republicans in California?  They are the ones that call delegates to county committees or the State Party they say elect our people or we will not donate to dime.  According to Right on Daily blog, that is what happened in San Bernardino last week.  Either give us the Republican Party or we will bankrupt you.  They are the ones that have no problem with government using laws and regulations to kill off small business and business competitors.  Watch as the “ask” the Harris/Biden Administration to reverse our policies on China—so they can use slave labor and cheap labor for their goods.  Won’t be a hard sell—the Biden family has already received millions from the Communist Chinese when he was Vice President.

“Did you hear mention that Trump is gone?

Back to the Koch organization’s plan. The country can suffer or go to hell as long as “we” prosper. Globalization works well for those on the top of the heap, after all. Pundits say it is more and more a feudalistic society anyway. 

When you are a lord or a lady, who cares about the peons? “Working class” was something the lessers and ethnics did—and some became successful carpenters, brick masons, or plumbers, right? They didn’t go to Yale or Brown, like us. 

Let’s just say the whole MAGA thing never happened or it was just a bad dream. Now we can go back to the future. Same old, same old.”

They will tell you are allowed to only support their candidate—a Meg Whitman, Neal Kashkari or Schwarzenegger types—Republican in registration, supporting Democrats for office.  If a conservative is nominated they will walk away from them—look at Buzz Patterson, Ted Howze and Greg Raths.  

Return of the Country Club Republicans

Political power has always been overrated. 

By Theodore Roosevelt Malloch, American Gratness, 1/16/21    

With “just over” a 10 handicap and a moderate right-of-center fairway drive they occupy the country club philosophy of Republicanism.

Living behind their rich, gated communities with large real estate holdings to maintain and property taxes to prove it, they pay their pool boys respectable, if not quite living wages. And they don’t ask the maids and gardeners from whence they hail or if they have green cards. 

In this world, cash is king.

The biggest question of the day is whether to play from the black tips or move up a couple of hundred yards to the gold tees. They feel their inner Gary Player. Mulligans for all—except DJT, who is disqualified.

“Nice new MAVRIK driver you have there, Fred.”

“Thanks, it straightens my tendency to slice right. Post-Trump, no one wants to be accused of that!”

The neighbors chatter about the latest wine club selection (good California cabs are now $100—how unfair is that!) and how wrong it is to consume evil foie gras. Have you tried Kombucha? Aren’t probiotics great? 

Yeah, who needs a gut? We prefer to be gutless wonders nowadays.

Having walked 10,000 steps this morning already behind the moat, they feel just great, downright robust. My new knee works well. The market is up again and, oh boy! Those tech stocks! What the hell do we care about H1-B visas or open borders, as long as the old 401(k) or Roth keeps moving up and up? 

Did you hear mention that Trump is gone?

Back to the Koch organization’s plan. The country can suffer or go to hell as long as “we” prosper. Globalization works well for those on the top of the heap, after all. Pundits say it is more and more a feudalistic society anyway. 

When you are a lord or a lady, who cares about the peons? “Working class” was something the lessers and ethnics did—and some became successful carpenters, brick masons, or plumbers, right? They didn’t go to Yale or Brown, like us. 

Let’s just say the whole MAGA thing never happened or it was just a bad dream. Now we can go back to the future. Same old, same old.

That Bad Orange Man was so declasse. And his rhetoric: Inciteful. He nearly turned our whole political party into a cabal of bible-thumping, gun-toting, deplorable maniacs. It smelled like Walmart, although, truth be told, we have never been there. 

It is time to bring Paul Ryan back. That kind of Randian libertarianism was at least harmless, and it always went along to get along. “Cocaine” (Don’t Ditch) Mitch can stay on forever, even though his deal with the much younger Chinese bride (and father-in-law) does turn an eye or two. Selling out America ain’t so bad if at least you pocket a lot of change in the deal. The Bidens did it too, right? (Where’s Hunter, by the way?)

Really, isn’t raking it in the very definition of a senator? A good man sent to Washington to get rich. To sell out and to represent the highest bidder, even if it is the Chinese Communist Party. Oh well, at least we don’t sleep with them like some people. 

Jack, do you have a foursome for tomorrow, yet? Juice up the carts and meet me at 11 a.m. on the practice range with some G&Ts to go. Trump is impeached (again) (ha!). Banned from Twitter and YouTube (haha!), stripped of all his honor, and belittled as a terrorist (hahaha!). 

Political power has always been overrated. 

Better to be a meaningless minority into infinity and let the socialists fight with each other and run amuck. What does it matter? Who cares? I heard the demographics are against us, anyway.  

We still have our stocks and our mutual fund accounts, gas guzzlers, trust funds, tax breaks, and handicaps to protect. They won’t take those away, will they? 

Someone probably needs to stand up to that AOC socialistic crowd. We did contribute to Black Lives Matter in the shakedown, didn’t we?  

I wonder who comes next on our side? 

Faithful warfightin’ Liz Cheney? Yes. Utah Mitt Romney, too. Except for his Mormon zeal he would have been a truly great president, no? He was with Bain and did PE. The “47 percent” thing got him. We could always bring back the Bushes. Isn’t there another son or grandson somewhere in that line of entitlement? 

Boys, mount your E-Z-GO carts now. We will do a shotgun start. Do you have enough balls? We have nothing to lose but our country!

Prager: Why the Left Has to Suppress Free Speech

If people had the opportunity of hearing all sides of an issue, folks would be able to make up their own minds.  If they are not allow to hear all the facts and opinions—then are told the other side is sexist, racist, homophobic, crazy, terrorists—you get the point—then people will do as they as told.  The Left cannot allow people free speech, because the decisions they make may not increase the totalitarian State.

“The National Association of Realtors has just announced that if you express dissenting views (on race, especially) in private, you may be fined and lose your membership in the organization—which effectively ends your career as a realtor.

So, we return to the opening question: Why does the left need to crush all dissent? This is a question made all the more stark because there is no parallel on the right: Conservatives do not shut down dissent or debate.

The answer, though the left will not acknowledge it, is the left fears dissent. And it does so for good reason. Leftism is essentially a giant balloon filled with nothing but hot air. Therefore, no matter how big the balloon—the Democratic Party, The New York Times, Yale University—all it takes is a mere pin to burst it.

Remember the infamous words of Al Gore, the scam master of global warming.  He said he would not debate the issue, it is a settled matter.  Of course he is ignorant, lied about data, made up data and then claimed he was the authority and cannot be challenged.  That is how it operates in Cuba, China and Russia.  Now it is happening in the United States.

Why the Left Has to Suppress Free Speech

Dennis Prager, Daily Signal,  1/19/21  

Dennis Prager is a columnist for The Daily Signal, nationally syndicated radio host, and creator of PragerU.

Let us begin with this fact: The left always suppresses speech. Since Vladimir Lenin and the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia in 1917, there has been no example of the left in control and not crushing dissent. 

That is one of the important differences between liberal and left: Liberalism and liberals believe in free speech.

(The present leftist threat to freedom in America, the greatest threat to freedom in American history, is made possible because liberals think they have more to fear from conservatives than from the left. Liberals do not understand that the left regards liberals as their useful idiots.)

The left controls universities. There is little or no dissent allowed at universities.

The left controls nearly every “news” medium. There is little or no dissent in the mainstream media—not in the “news” sections and not in the opinion sections.

The left controls Hollywood. No dissent is allowed in Hollywood.

That is why we have “cancel culture”—the silencing and firing of anyone who publicly dissents from the left, and even “publicly” is no longer necessary.

The National Association of Realtors has just announced that if you express dissenting views (on race, especially) in private, you may be fined and lose your membership in the organization—which effectively ends your career as a realtor.

So, we return to the opening question: Why does the left need to crush all dissent? This is a question made all the more stark because there is no parallel on the right: Conservatives do not shut down dissent or debate.

The answer, though the left will not acknowledge it, is the left fears dissent. And it does so for good reason. Leftism is essentially a giant balloon filled with nothing but hot air. Therefore, no matter how big the balloon—the Democratic Party, The New York Times, Yale University—all it takes is a mere pin to burst it.

Leftism is venerated by intellectuals. But there is little intellectual substance to leftism. It is a combination of doctrine and emotion. The proof? Those with intellectual depth do not stifle dissent; they welcome it.

That is why universities are so opposed to conservatives coming to speak on campus. One articulate conservative can undo years of left-wing indoctrination in a one-hour talk or Q&A. I know this from personal experience on campuses. You can, too.

Watch the speeches given by any conservatives allowed to speak on a campus—many of these talks are still on YouTube—and you will see large halls filled with students yearning to hear something other than left-wing pablum. Look at their faces, filled with rapt attention to ideas they never heard that are clearly having an impact.

Universities are entirely right to fear our coming to speak. We come with the pin that bursts their $50,000-a-year balloon.

That is also why it is so hard to get any of them to debate any of us. In 35 years of radio, I have never mistreated or bullied a guest. I was unfailingly polite to an icon of the left, Howard Zinn, the America-hating author of the America-hating “A People’s History of the United States.”

I even invited a UCLA political science professor and violinist, one of seven members of the Santa Monica Symphony Orchestra who refused to play when I conducted the orchestra in a Joseph Haydn symphony in the Disney Concert Hall—solely because I’m a conservative.

Despite his public letter, in which he accused me of holding “horribly bigoted positions” and wrote, “Please urge your friends to not attend this concert, which helps normalize bigotry in our community,” I nevertheless invited him on my national radio show. He agreed.

I had him in studio for an entire hour and treated him and his wife (who accompanied him) with great respect, despite my contempt for his false accusations and his advocacy of the cancel culture. Every American should hear that hour.

Unfortunately for the emotional and intellectual health of our society, he, Zinn, and a few others were anomalies. Of the 100 or so left-wing authors, professors, and columnists invited to appear on my show, almost none has responded in the affirmative. They prefer NPR, where they are never challenged.

The opposite, however, is not true: Every conservative intellectual I know says yes to every one of the (very few) left-wing invitations we receive. Of course, we are almost never invited. We regularly invite leftists. Leftists almost never invite us.

They claim it’s because we are not up to their intellectual level and they have no desire to waste their time. One would think that the opportunity to publicly show how vapid we conservatives really are would be too good to pass up.

Leftists do not debate us or appear as guests on our shows and prevent us from speaking whenever possible, because they (correctly) fear conservatives.

Race-baiters such as Ibram X. Kendi or Ta-Nehisi Coates or “White Fragility” author Robin DiAngelo would never debate Larry Elder, for example.

Why won’t they? Because they would be shown to be the intellectually shallow purveyors of hate they are. Deep down, they know it. Elder is one of many conservative black intellectuals who left-wing blacks (and whites) refuse to debate.

Now you know why the left suppresses free speech: because it has to. If there is free speech, there is dissent. And if there is dissent, there is no more left.

Left Calls for ‘Army of Citizen Detectives’ to Monitor & Report Trump Supporters

Like in Nazi Germany, the Soviet Union, Cuba and China, there is a move to create an Army of “citizens” to snitch on their neighbors.  Have too many people at your home?  Call the police.  Think some is out an about not wearing a mask—call the cops.  Think someone is running an underground pizza place or barbershop—first to the cops then to prison.

“Many on the left are promoting a recent video created by novelist and left-wing activist Don Winslow, which calls upon citizens to become cyber detectives to monitor and report fellow citizen Trump supporters to authorities while comparing the work of this “army of citizens” to that which led to the capture of al-Qaeda founder Osama bin Laden.

“On January 20, Donald Trump will become the Commander-in-Chief of a different army,” the slightly over two-minute clip begins. The words “This army” are then displayed as Trump supporters in Washington, DC, flash on the screen.

The threat addressed is described as emanating from “radical” conservatives who live among us. The clip continues:

Support President Trump or honest elections—report them to the authorities, obviously these are terrorists waiting to hit a target.  We live in dark days.

Left Calls for ‘Army of Citizen Detectives’ to Monitor & Report Trump Supporters

Joshua Klein, Breitbart,  1/19/21 

Many on the left are promoting a recent video created by novelist and left-wing activist Don Winslow, which calls upon citizens to become cyber detectives to monitor and report fellow citizen Trump supporters to authorities while comparing the work of this “army of citizens” to that which led to the capture of al-Qaeda founder Osama bin Laden.

“On January 20, Donald Trump will become the Commander-in-Chief of a different army,” the slightly over two-minute clip begins. The words “This army” are then displayed as Trump supporters in Washington, DC, flash on the screen.

The threat addressed is described as emanating from “radical” conservatives who live among us. The clip continues:

The greatest threat facing America today comes from within: radical extreme conservatives, also known as domestic terrorists. They’re hidden among us, disguised behind regular jobs. They are your children’s teachers. They work at supermarkets, malls, doctor’s offices, and many are police officers and soldiers.

The video, which has received over 3.5 million views since, then claims that the president will begin a civil war once out of office and that ordinary citizens must “fight back.”

“In the years ahead, Trump will lead his army of domestic terrorists. He will encourage and incite violence,” the clip states. “He will start a civil war.”

“We have to fight back,” the clip continues. “In this new war, the battlefield has changes. Computers can be more valuable than guns. And this is what we need now more than ever: an army of citizen detectives.”

The narrator then reiterates the clip’s bold call.

“I’m proposing we form a citizen army,” he says. “Our weapons will be computers and cell phones. We who are monitoring extremists on the internet and reporting their findings to authorities.”

Outrageously, the clip then compares this “army of citizens” against Trump supporters to the monitoring and discovery of arch-terrorist Osama bin Laden.

“Remember, before the Navy SEALs killed Osama bin Laden he had to be found,” the clip continues. “He was found by a CIA analyst working on a computer thousands of miles away.”

Concluding with a call to action, the clip calls upon viewers to understand that the success of this “army” is in their hands.

“It’s up to you,” the video concludes, adding the hashtag “#TrumpsNewArmy.”

The hashtag has seen tens of thousands of tweets since.

Winslow, the producer of the clip, is a bestselling author of nearly two dozen crime and mystery novels as well as a screenwriter and has been the recipient of many prestigious awards.

His thriller The Death and Life of Bobby Z (1997) was turned into a film starring Paul Walker and Laurence Fishburne. Winslow also wrote the adaptation of Savages into a film of the same name, with Oliver Stone directing.

He has been a continual critic of the Trump administration.

In October, Winslow produced a Joe Biden campaign ad narrated by left-wing actor Jeff Daniels which took aim at President Trump in an effort to flip Michigan blue.

Winslow added several messages when publicizing the new clip, clarifying just how far he seeks to go.

Winslow called for a “citizen army patrolling the Internet” ready to expose, identify, notify law enforcement and notify employers.

“I’m calling for an AN ARMY OF CITIZEN DETECTIVES to FIGHT #TrumpsNewArmy of white supremacy. Will you help? Will you spread word?” he wrote.

“This video is a CALL TO ACTION,” he reiterates.

“No one in #TrumpsNewArmy should be given a pass,” he wrote in one tweet while clarifying in another that members of “Trump’s New Army” include Sen. Ted Cruz, Sen. Josh Hawley and GOP Rep. Lauren Boebert.

Many on the left have already begun promoting the clip and encouraging viewers to sign on.

“America or Trump,” wrote Pulitzer Prize-winning senior art critic and New York Magazine columnist Jerry Saltz. “An army of citizens prepared to root out and arrest #TrumpsNewArmy in their new cause of Civil War and Right Wing Domestic Terrorism.”

“How many domestic terrorists will T**** inspire to violence against Americans in the next year?” asked Miami-based Huffington post columnist Grant Stern. “Probably a lot. #TrumpsNewArmy.”

“ARREST EVERY TRAITOR,” wrote former Congressional candidate from Florida Dr. Dena Grayson.

“Spread. This. Everywhere,” wrote liberal radio host Chip Franklin.

“The domestic terrorists are standing back (again) and standing by (again),” wrote Emmy-winning marketing director Ryan Bell. “#TrumpsNewArmy will continue to be a danger to our nation after he is no longer president.”

“Another powerful and poignant video from @donwinslow America it’s up to us!” wrote Author/activist and Huffington Post contributor Ariaa Jaeger. “If you want democracy participate in ensuring it succeeds! Please RT.”

“Spread #TrumpsNewArmy by @donwinslow far and wide,” wrote former Editor-In-Chief and co-founder of Hill Reporter James Kosur.
“What happens to #Cult45 when their Dear Leader blows them off to focus on his prosecution in New York?” asked Hill Reporter contributing writer Tara Dublin. “#TrumpsNewArmy is a #DipshitMilitia of losers who thought their whiteness would protect them, and NOPE #MAGAIsOver.”

“It is up to ALL OF US, in this together,” wrote filmmaker Adam Rifkin.

Faux conservative anti-Trump Lincoln Project senior adviser for veterans affairs Fred Wellman called to turn in the “insurrectionists and racists.”

“Don is right. It’s up to us,” wrote Wellman.

“Do you love this country? Fight for it,” he added. “We can’t let these insurrectionists and racists take it from us. Turn them in. Fight for our democracy. #TrumpsNewArmy”

Anti-Trump activist Majid M. Padellan (a.k.a Brooklyn Dad Defiant), with a Twitter following of over 840 thousand, was among the strongest supporters of the initiative.

“#TrumpsNewArmy is VILE. And we KNOW who they are,” he wrote. “They are our teachers. They are our neighbors. They are our police officers. They are EVERYWHERE. EXPOSE THEIR TREASON.”

“[Trump’s] ‘army’ is still here, hiding amongst us,” he added. “They are traitors. They are evil. And they MUST be rooted OUT.”

Referencing the September 11 terror attacks, Padellan reiterated the need to “expose” the “terrorists.”

“After 9/11, we were told: ‘If you see something, say something,’” he wrote. “We have TERRORISTS in our midst. Some of us KNOW these people. It is our patriotic DUTY to expose them. Save a life. Say something. Expose #TrumpsNewArmy.”

“Spread this new gem by @donwinslow far and wide,” wrote ReallyAmerican.com, a Super PAC “dedicated to defending Truth, Democracy, Social Justice, and Environment” and fighting “to End the Nightmare of the Trump Presidency and right-wing rule.”

But not everyone commended the clip’s message.

“This video is diabolical, painting millions of citizens, not only as disloyal to the nation–but as literal terrorists–as it attempts to draft the rest into fighting their neighbors in a civil war the filmmakers clearly desire,” wrote podcaster Bret Weinstein.

“I stand with all patriots against this madness,” he added.

“You are delusional,” replied DJ Brian Dawe. “Once again… your blanket stereotyping of all Trump supporters and conservatives in general is some Hitler vs the Jew shit.”

“You should be at least temporality disabled by Twitter for inciting violence, but there is a clear double standard on this platform,” he added.

“This is so dangerous it’s hard to sum up in a tweet,” responded producer and director Robby Starbuck. “It puts a target on the head of every conservative, calls for war and propagandizes to form a vigilante group that would narc on neighbors.”

“If Hitler or Stalin we’re alive today, they’d proudly use your video,” he added. “Sick and evil.”

“Hey, @jack @TwitterSafety… found actual incitement of violence in case you’re interested in enforcing your own rules at any point,” quipped Twitter user Eric Spencer.

The notion of associating Trump supporters with terrorism is not novel to Winslow’s initiative.

Last week, Representative Eric Swalwell (D-CA) stated during PBS’s impeachment coverage that President Trump had “radicalized” his supporters the same way the late terrorist leader Osama bin Laden had.

Under Newsom, California sees population decline for first time in more than century

Our chicken have come home to roost.  The scavengers of government overstated our population by 400,000.  Why, so they can give away more tax dollars.  In fact we lost, per the Census Bureau, 70,000.  Other real time estimates show it to be closer to 150,000.

“The California Department of finance reported that in 2018, California’s population growth rate fell to 0.47 percent – the slowest growth recorded since data collection began in 1900 until this past year.

“An older demographic and a wealth tax are among the reasons the state’s growth rate has stalled,” the Christian Scientist Monitor reported.

Population decline is “evidence of the housing shortage. Or simply put, it’s too expensive to live here,” Dowell Myers, a professor at the USC Price School of Public Policy and director of the Population Dynamics Research Group, argued.

William Fulton, a former mayor of Ventura and director of the Kinder Institute for Urban Research at Rice University, notes that the average home price in the Bay Area is more than $1 million. One of California’s problems is that it “has under-produced housing since the late ‘80s. It will take years – if not decades – of aggressive housing production to reverse that trend.”

Do not blame a “housing shortage” for the decline in population.  Blame the government policies that caused the shortage and the lack of affordable housing.  The shortage is just a symptom of failed policies of government.

Under Newsom, California sees population decline for first time in more than century

By Bethany Blankley | The Center Square, 1/19/21   

 (The Center Square) – California, the state that has led population growth nationally for the last 170 years, reported a population loss under Gov. Gavin Newsom for the first time since 1850, according to newly published Census Bureau data.

Until 2020, California had gained population in every year since 1900.

Increasing taxes, restrictive policies on businesses and ongoing lockdowns have led individuals and Silicon Valley companies to exit the Golden State in record numbers over the last two years, but in 2020 for the first time California lost 70,000 residents on net.

From 2010 to 2015, California gained 300,000 residents on average annually, with a total gain of 1.6 million. Since 2015, California’s population growth declined until reaching nearly zero in 2019.

During that time, the Census Bureau restated California’s 2018 to 2019 population change, which had been projected to be a gain of 51,000, to a gain of 147.

The California Department of finance reported that in 2018, California’s population growth rate fell to 0.47 percent – the slowest growth recorded since data collection began in 1900 until this past year.

“An older demographic and a wealth tax are among the reasons the state’s growth rate has stalled,” the Christian Scientist Monitor reported.

Population decline is “evidence of the housing shortage. Or simply put, it’s too expensive to live here,” Dowell Myers, a professor at the USC Price School of Public Policy and director of the Population Dynamics Research Group, argued.

William Fulton, a former mayor of Ventura and director of the Kinder Institute for Urban Research at Rice University, notes that the average home price in the Bay Area is more than $1 million. One of California’s problems is that it “has under-produced housing since the late ‘80s. It will take years – if not decades – of aggressive housing production to reverse that trend.”

Fulton explains, “Many cities and counties in California have constructed their whole approach to budgets around two things: 1. Ever-increasing sales taxes; 2. The front-end property tax increases and impact fee revenues that come with new residential construction. If population growth goes away permanently, sales tax may flatten and the front-end tax and fee revenues will likely stagnate. Cities will have long-term financial problems.”

Population growth decline was notable last year with residents and companies moving out state, bringing their tax dollars with them.

According to United Van Lines’ National Migration study based on data from its customers’ 2020 state-to-state migration patterns, 59 percent of its customers left California for another state as opposed to moving in to California.

In 2020, Charles Schwab announced it was relocating its corporate headquarters from San Francisco to the Dallas area. Apple announced it was building a new campus in Austin. Oracle and Hewlett Packard Enterprise also announced they were relocating to Texas.

Billionaire Elon Musk, CEO of Tesla and other companies, also moved to Texas from California, opening a new warehouse in the Austin area.

The California Department of Finance released different population data, which indicates that California didn’t lose people but gained 21,200 based on data for the year ending July 1, 2020.

The Census Bureau’s data states as of July 1, California had 39.37 million people, compared to the state’s analysis of 39.78 million, a difference of roughly 400,000.

California Health Official Orders ‘Pause’ On Moderna Vaccine Lot

So far 50% of health professional in Riverside, 40% of L.A. firefighters and 20-30% of the California health professionals are refusing to take the vaccine.  I have asked what do they know we don’t.  Now we know.

“In this public statement, Dr. Erica Pan, California’s state epidemiologist, told healthcare providers to “pause” distributing batch 41L20A of the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine.

“A higher-than-usual number of possible allergic reactions were reported with a specific lot of Moderna vaccine administered at one community vaccination clinic,” said Dr. Pan. “Fewer than 10 individuals required medical attention over the span of 24 hours. Out of an extreme abundance of caution and also recognizing the extremely limited supply of vaccine, we are recommending that providers use other available vaccine inventory and pause the administration of vaccines from Moderna Lot 041L20A until the investigation by the CDC, FDA, Moderna and the state is complete.”

Will you put something in your body when you do not know of the side effects or the long term effect of the drug?  Up to you, it is a free country—so far.

California Health Official Orders ‘Pause’ On Moderna Vaccine Lot

A California health official recommended the state stop using a batch of Moderna’s vaccine, as possible severe allergic reactions occurred.

Carly Baldwin, Patch Staff, 1/18/21   

SAN DIEGO, CA — On Sunday, a California health official said to stop using a particular batch of Moderna’s coronavirus vaccine, as possible allergic reactions have occurred and are now under investigation.

In this public statement, Dr. Erica Pan, California’s state epidemiologist, told healthcare providers to “pause” distributing batch 41L20A of the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine.

“A higher-than-usual number of possible allergic reactions were reported with a specific lot of Moderna vaccine administered at one community vaccination clinic,” said Dr. Pan. “Fewer than 10 individuals required medical attention over the span of 24 hours. Out of an extreme abundance of caution and also recognizing the extremely limited supply of vaccine, we are recommending that providers use other available vaccine inventory and pause the administration of vaccines from Moderna Lot 041L20A until the investigation by the CDC, FDA, Moderna and the state is complete.”

The nature of the allergic reactions was not given, nor was the exact name or location of the community clinic where the vaccine was given out.

However, San Diego County health officials confirmed last week that a half-dozen healthcare workers who were inoculated at the Petco Park vaccination center had suffered allergic reactions. With her public statement, Dr. Parks also shared this guide from the CDC on what to do should allergic anaphylaxis occur.

Those affected experienced a severe allergic reaction during the standard observation period after getting the injection, she said.

After the reactions were reported, the community clinic closed for a few hours this weekend and then switched to using another lot of Moderna vaccine.

More than 330,000 doses from this Moderna lot have been distributed to 287 providers across the state of California. The shipments arrived in California between Jan. 5 and 12. California has not been notified of any other cluster or individual events related to this lot, said Dr. Pan.

Moderna, the Centers for Disease Control and the Food & Drug Administration are all investigating.

No other significant issues with allergic reactions have occurred at any other location where the affected lot was distributed, according to the state of California. It was not clear which other locations received the affected doses.

The news comes as state and local officials clamor for more doses of the vaccine to expedite the shots. In Los Angeles County, a mass-vaccination site opened Friday at Dodger Stadium, but the operators of the site warned over the weekend that it could potentially run out of doses as early as Wednesday.

Op-Ed: Canceling Keystone XL Pipeline is a gift to China and Russia

You get what you pay for.  In this case the Communist Chinese and a wealthy Russian gave millions to the Biden family.  Now Biden has decided against keeping America oil independent.  So he is ending the Keystone Pipeline, tens of thousands of well-paying jobs and billions in revenues and taxes to grow our economy.  Instead he plans on us buying oil from Venezuela and other terrorist nations.

“What’s fascinating about Keystone is how un-fascinating the project actually really is. Sure, it’s a marvel of engineering and an extraordinary accomplishment of human and mechanical skills. The 1,200 mile pipeline from Alberta, Canada, to the U.S. Gulf Coast carrying crude oil to be refined is a great infrastructure project. A State Department study commissioned during the Obama administration (when Joe Biden was Veep, a point which requires emphasis) determined the pipeline would create 3,200 temporary construction jobs directly, 42,000 additional jobs indirectly, and generate over $2 billion in wages. For the people in Montana, South Dakota, and Nebraska, the states through which the proposed pipeline will transverse, that’s an enormous opportunity.

This is what he killed—and he knew it.  Why does Harris/Biden and the Democrats hate us so much?

Op-Ed: Canceling Keystone XL Pipeline is a gift to China and Russia

Daniel Turner / RealClearWire, 1/21/21  

Joe Biden’s plans to cancel the Keystone XL Pipeline is a gift to someone. The radical green groups for sure: they have opposed the oil link since its inception. The trucking and railroad industry will benefit, too, because once the pipeline is stopped, then the oil will be transported in and around America by something with wheels. It’s also a gift to our adversaries: for who will benefit when America and Canada can’t bring their fossil fuels to market? The competition. Russia and Venezuela will be thrilled to know their market share will increase thanks to the Biden administration’s fumble.

What’s fascinating about Keystone is how un-fascinating the project actually really is. Sure, it’s a marvel of engineering and an extraordinary accomplishment of human and mechanical skills. The 1,200 mile pipeline from Alberta, Canada, to the U.S. Gulf Coast carrying crude oil to be refined is a great infrastructure project. A State Department study commissioned during the Obama administration (when Joe Biden was Veep, a point which requires emphasis) determined the pipeline would create 3,200 temporary construction jobs directly, 42,000 additional jobs indirectly, and generate over $2 billion in wages. For the people in Montana, South Dakota, and Nebraska, the states through which the proposed pipeline will transverse, that’s an enormous opportunity.

Joe Biden claims to love infrastructure. His “Build Back Better” program commits to infrastructure programs which create “good paying” jobs and achieve “net-zero” emissions. (Know what has emissions? Trucks and trains. Know what doesn’t? Pipelines. But alas, there’s no place for facts in a party which simplistically “believes in science.”). Eliminating Keystone for purely political reasons eliminates these jobs and all the opportunities for these communities. Rural America will not fare well under the Biden energy agenda. After all, this is just the beginning.

Are pipelines scary? If you think so, I have the plot of a horror film: the call is coming from inside the house. Your house is full of pipelines. America is crisscrossed with over 2.6 million miles of pipeline. That’s enough to get to the moon and back – more than five times. Is there a risk? Of course, and the Pipeline and Hazardous Material Safety Administration, part of the U.S. Department of Transportation, records all pipeline incidents. Last year there were fewer than a dozen considered “serious” and one tragically resulted in the death of four workers in Texas.

Let’s compare that to trucking, which is the fallback transportation method after the pipeline is ignorantly canceled. Another office at the Department of Transportation, the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, also records accidents. In 2018, the most recent year for recorded data, large trucks were involved in 4,862 fatal crashes, 112,000 crashes which resulted in injury, and 414,000 crashes which resulted in property damage.

You tell me which is greener and safer: pipelines or trucks? The facts are clear, and this is no way a knock on the trucking industry, which is a vital, noble and risky profession. It’s just a technological reality.

Keystone was also making a massive renewable energy investment, and you’d think that alone would please the green Biden team. According to The Wall Street Journal, “Canada’s TC Energy Corp. TRP 0.29% is committing to spend $1.7 billion on solar, wind and battery power to operate the partially completed 2,000-mile pipeline.” Furthermore, the company pledges “also to hire a union workforce and eliminate all greenhouse-gas emissions from operations by 2030.” These points which hit the very plan Biden promises should trump (pardon the pun) politics and keep the project alive.

Canada has an economy to run, too, and the country has lots of oil to sell. If Keystone is stopped, it will simply be sold elsewhere. China? Probably. As the world’s largest oil importer at 10-11 million barrels a day, China would love to buy oil from anyone but America. Canada needs revenue and jobs. China needs oil. Losing our northern neighbor’s reliable, inexpensive, and abundant crude to the Chinese Communist Party nation would be a foreign policy collapse. But if Biden wants to continue the Obama-Biden tradition, more foreign policy disasters are to be expected.

I’ve written here before about the great gift to China which is the entire Biden energy agenda. At the same time he will be watching Canada’s oil go to China, Biden will be buying Chinese wind and solar technologies with borrowed American tax dollars. Meanwhile, Russia will be selling its natural gas to Europe, while America will join the other eunuchs of the Paris Climate Accord to keep China and Russia laughing at all of us.

Great plan. Putin and Xi themselves couldn’t have crafted a better one.

Energy policy isn’t the simplicity of soundbites. “Cancel Keystone” is a bumper sticker, not the decision of a serious politician who sees the real world fallout of jobs and geopolitics let alone the increase in emissions that will result.

This is just the beginning of an energy agenda that will cripple us on so many levels: jobs, cost of living, and opportunity. It will hurt our critical allies in Canada and Europe. It will benefit our enemies, Russia and China. And it will do absolutely nothing for the environment.

It’s almost as if Joe Biden isn’t the “moderate” we were always told he is, even if his tweets will be nicer than his predecessor.

Daniel Turner is the founder and executive director of Power The Future, a national nonprofit organization that advocates for American energy jobs.

Bialosky: Biden’s First Act is Economic Insanity

I agree with my good friend Bruce that the Harris/Biden $1.9 trillion is terrible for the economy—even the CBO notes that the raise in minimum wage will cost over one million jobs.

But, Bruce, this is NOY the worst economic decision of his first day.  He also signed a statement that we are back into the Paris Climate Agreement.  WE have to pay $3 TRILLION, agree to close down numerous businesses and kill millions of jobs.  Of course his friends the Communist Chinese, which helped finance his family is not a participant in the Paris Accords.  They are smart enough to know it would kill their economy.  Biden knows he is killing our economy—but just does not care.

Biden’s First Act is Economic Insanity

Posted by Bruce Bialosky, Flashreport,  1/20/21 

Everyone wishes success to our incoming President. Unlike the crowd that hated Trump, Republicans will not be sitting with their voodoo dolls sticking pins into them in hopes of Biden falling on his face. As much as I would like to applaud Biden’s $1.9 Trillion stimulus plan, it would be an act of economic insanity to do such. Let me explain why.

First and foremost, Congress just passed a $900 billion bill to stimulate the economy. Virtually none of that has been spent. Some people have received stimulus checks, but the vast majority of the law is still being dissected. Why would we commit an extensive amount of new funds when we have not even spent the recently approved funds? It is unclear that all the monies were spent from the Cares Act in March 2020. The answer is this is not really economic relief. This is a Democrat hodgepodge of a wish list along with union mollification. That is not for reasons of economics.

One would also expect that Biden’s economic team would have a handle on what is going on in our economy. The facts are common knowledge; they do not need to get transition briefings from the Trump team. Americans made $1 trillion more in the period of March through November 2020 than they did in the corresponding period of March through November 2019. Some of that was stimulus money, but many people are doing well.

Americans also significantly reduced their credit card debt by over $100 billion dollars. Part of this was that there were fewer places to spend money — no movies, baseball games, restaurants or concerts to attend. The other part was people used their stimulus checks to retire debt.

Americans bought homes at the highest rates we have seen since the 2007 crash of the real estate market. Homeownership rate is at a 15-year high. There is very little inventory of residential housing to sell.

There are certainly areas of the economy that are suffering, but this bill does nothing to address them. The already passed Save Our Stages Act, of which very few people are aware. Apparently, neither does the SBA because they have no program to get at the $15 billion offered which addresses problems with concert and play venues and their need to stay afloat while they are closed. The Biden bill does nothing to focus on other hard-hit areas of the economy.

Certainly two areas hardest hit are restaurants and hotels and neither is addressed here. But let us review some of the things that are addressed.

If you remember there was the Unity Task Force which this column analyzed in its entirety, a detailed six-part wish list. This bill is an amalgamation of all the ideas in that report. Many proposals are picked straight out of the report. Though the bill is stated at $1.9 trillion no one knows how much it really will cost.

Fox example, they want to hire 100,000 health care workers across the United States. Nearly every health care worker is actively employed: it will cost billions to train these people. The new employees will really work for local governments. How long will the Feds pay the cost of these employees before it is shifted to municipal governments? There is no explanation. The entire program is amorphous and has questionable purpose.

New Stimulus Payments – This proposes another $1,400 per taxpayer and additional sums for children of taxpayers. Though this is limited to people with income below a certain level it still does not make sense. It is based on 2019 taxable income. We don’t know if people above the line had their incomes plummet in 2020 and they actually need money. And then there are people who received checks whose income went up. This program is based on outdated data which makes it significantly inefficient.

$15 national minimum wage – This is a payment to their union supporters who want to use this as a base for their next contract increases. There is no consideration of the fact that a large number of these employees are at restaurants that cannot even open because of government edict. Cities like Seattle and San Francisco lost a significant number of restaurants before COVID because of the $15 minimum wage. How well will this work in Peoria or Bangor with their lower cost structure? Also, many states have wage reduction for tipped employees. They want to trash that which makes no economic sense. The Congressional Budget Office has estimated the increase in minimum wage would decrease employment by 3.7 million jobs. No wonder the Biden plan includes an increase in unemployment benefits and food stamps.

The rest of the proposals in the bill can be broken down into two basic categories:

1. Those available to average citizens: They must go to a governmental entity and plead for or jump through hoops to obtain. One program in the most recently passed bill is the Employee Retention Credit (ERC). The ERC was in the Cares Act, but was ignored because it was a choice between a PPP loan or the ERC. That has been revised, but the calculation of the credit is so complex you must hire an outside consultant. There are many programs that look nice in this bill, but will only be available if you can wiggle your way through the maze.

2. Those going to unionized government workers who will do nothing to get the money and really don’t deserve it. They are getting the funds as payback for their support of the Democrats.

The second category has two programs in particular that are sizable and annoying.

1. There is the $130 billion to reopen public schools that don’t need that money. The schools’ principle reason for not opening is the public school teachers and their unions have refused to show up for work yet remain being paid. Private schools are open and parents are using other home-based means to educate their children. There are studies that show extremely small COVID exposure for the teachers or the students. This $130 billion will end up as a boondoggle and probably in teacher retirement funds. We will never know how the money is spent.

2. Second, the $350 billion for state and local governments. It refers to keeping “front line public workers on the job,” but we all know funds are fungible. There are no stated requirements for these funds. Rest assured the governments will not have to jump through the same hoops as private businesses do to get funds because public employee unions will end up with the money. We do not even know if these governments have lost revenue.

Here is a suggestion. To get a second PPP loan businesses must show they have a 25% reduction of revenues in any one quarter from 2020 over 2019. Why don’t we have a similar test for the governments but do it on their annual receipts. If the state, county or city has not had a 25% reduction in receipts from 2020 to 2019 then they cannot receive funding. The governmental entity will have to cut some of their non-essential workers (i.e., most). This is too good an idea, so it will never happen.

We can go on and on because there is so much here. It is a Democrat grab bag. If passed, many of these proposed ideas will likely be added to the next budget and make that annual budget even more out of whack.

Other than the money for vaccinations — which have been forestalled by incompetent or negligent state and local governments — not much is worthy of consideration here, especially with $900 billion still to be spent. Mayor Lightfoot of Chicago says it will take her 18 months to vaccinate the people of Chicago. Giving her more money will not make her more efficient.

This is just as effective as the Obama stimulus that wasted almost a trillion dollars. Can anyone say “shovel ready jobs”?