Supreme Court Sets Dangerous Precedent Of Letting The American People Make Medical Decisions For Themselves

(Disclosure:  This is satire –but the bottom line Is serious)

Imagine you have to go to the Supreme Court in order to get the health care you want!  Hundreds of thousands of dollars was spent on what should be a no-brainer.  This is what happens when government becomes a tyrant.

“The SCOTUS has struck down Biden’s vaccine mandates on the grounds that they are unconstitutional. Experts say this sets a dangerous precedent of letting individuals make their own medical decisions.

“What am I supposed to do now that I don’t have private companies working with the Federal government to force me to inject a foreign substance into my body?” said Linda Waddlebum, a concerned mother of 6 cats. “So dangerous and shortsighted. How will I stay healthy? I don’t even recognize this America anymore.”

We need to stand up to government before it has us on our knees.

Supreme Court Sets Dangerous Precedent Of Letting The American People Make Medical Decisions For Themselves

Babylon Bee, 1/14/22 

U.S.—The SCOTUS has struck down Biden’s vaccine mandates on the grounds that they are unconstitutional. Experts say this sets a dangerous precedent of letting individuals make their own medical decisions.

“What am I supposed to do now that I don’t have private companies working with the Federal government to force me to inject a foreign substance into my body?” said Linda Waddlebum, a concerned mother of 6 cats. “So dangerous and shortsighted. How will I stay healthy? I don’t even recognize this America anymore.”

In response to the court’s decision, a large group of protestors has gathered outside of the Supreme Court building. “Pfizer knows best! What they inject, I can’t object!” they chanted while ripping up copies of the constitution. “Give us petty tyranny or give us death! Abolish the Supreme Court!” 

“You can’t give people choices! What if they make the wrong one? One that isn’t what I wanted them to do?” said Waddlebum. “Next thing you know, people will decide to send their kids back to school and return to work in person without masks.”

At publishing time, people were dangerously continuing on with their lives making the best medical decisions possible for themselves and their families. They were even able to make these decisions without fear of losing their health care

.

Top of Form

About Stephen Frank

Stephen Frank is the publisher and editor of California Political News and Views. He speaks all over California and appears as a guest on several radio shows each week. He has also served as a guest host on radio talk shows. He is a fulltime political consultant.

Comments

  1. Sadly the health industry was not given the same right. I have a friend that works in the health industry, that is almost recovered from having COVID last year and will be required to wear a mask and have the vaccine if she wants to go back to work. She was hoping that this case would spare her from future harm. After having such a severe COVID experience, she feels from her research that she will be damaged from the vaccine, and the mask will make if very hard to breath given the loss of air capacity that she is still recovering from. This is nothing more than tyranny and we need to demand that this stops. Hopefully people with common sense and that actually value the Constitution will get control of the House and the Senate… If not we are in a world of hurt.

  2. When commenting that masks make it difficult to breathe, the typical response is “that’s b-s. Masks don’t interfere with the airflow!” But if they didn’t interfere with airflow, they would not be of any use to stop the airflow containing virus. Of course they do interfere with airflow, and anyone who has diminished O2 in their blood, has COPD or any breathing problem may suffer greatly from wearing a mask for more than a few minutes, for lack of sufficient oxygen. And if you have CoVid, your mask, which is contaminated, just keeps re-infecting you with virus load.

Speak Your Mind

*