Thousands Lost Their Homes While Rep. Katie Porter Made Six Figures

Democrats love a good crisis, especially when they are able to make a LOT of money from them.  In combination with Kamala Harris, Willie Browns former girlfriend (though he was married at the time.  Katie Porter an attorney and now Progressive member of Congress from Orange County was allowed to make over $300,000 a year from the foreclosures of folks harmed by economic conditions.

“In California however, then-Attorney General Kamala Harris decided to appoint a political ally, former law Professor Katie Porter, as California’s monitor to oversee the $18 billion that was supposed to help underwater California homeowners. Porter was the only state-appointed monitor in the nation and came out of the gates with tough talk about how other programs to help homeowners failed to live up to their hype.

Using funds originally meant for California’s troubled homeowners, Katie Porter negotiated with Kamala Harris a $300,000 salary and benefits package for herself and a $1.56 million-dollar budget for an 11-member staff. Porter, who was then a professor at UCI Law School making approximately $250,000+ per year, ran her operation out of UCI’s Irvine campus and according to University records, Porter went $1.57 million over budget, totaling $3.13 million in staff salaries and benefits. All of this funded by money meant to assist distressed homeowners.

You read that right—the taxpayers paid her $250,00 a year to teach, another $300,000 to take homes and then used the UC Irvine campus as her office, so she had no overhead!  You pay her salary and overhead!  No wonder she had the money to run for Congress.  Katie Porter is your run of the mill Democrat.  They cry about the poor as they steal from the public.  Shame on us for allowing this.  Maybe a good lawsuit to get the money back from her—at least to pay for the use of the campus as her private office?  Just a thought.

Thousands Lost Their Homes While Rep. Katie Porter Made Six Figures

Thousands of distressed California homeowners lost their homes in the financial crisis waiting for financial assistance, while Katie Porter took a six-figure salary from the big banks mortgage settlement funds

By SoCal Daily Pulse, 5/21/19

First-term Congresswoman Katie Porter (D-Irvine) made waves last month after her grilling of Chase Bank CEO Jamie Dimon went viral. If the soundbites tell us anything, it is that Rep. Katie Porter wants to brand herself as the Patron Saint of consumer finance and taxpayers.

However, in the fracas of a Democratic Presidential Primary, some inconvenient details are starting to emerge about Katie Porter’s tenure as a “watchdog” of bank settlement funds meant to assist California homeowners facing foreclosure.

In 2012, America’s state attorneys general negotiated a punitive settlement with the nation’s largest banks in response to predatory and fraudulent mortgage practices that fueled the financial crisis. A national monitor was appointed by the States to oversee the $40+ billion settlement and ensure compliance that settlement funds reached troubled homeowners at risk of losing their homes.

In California however, then-Attorney General Kamala Harris decided to appoint a political ally, former law professor Katie Porter, as California’s monitor to oversee the $18 billion that was supposed to help underwater California homeowners. Porter was the only state-appointed monitor in the nation and came out of the gates with tough talk about how other programs to help homeowners failed to live up to their hype.

Using funds originally meant for California’s troubled homeowners, Katie Porter negotiated with Kamala Harris a $300,000 salary and benefits package for herself and a $1.56 million-dollar budget for an 11-member staff. Porter, who was then a professor at UCI Law School making approximately $250,000+ per year, ran her operation out of UCI’s Irvine campus and according to University records, Porter went $1.57 million over budget, totaling $3.13 million in staff salaries and benefits. All of this funded by money meant to assist distressed homeowners.

Porter and Harris apologists may claim that California’s stewardship of these funds led to superior results compared to other states, however consumer advocates that worked with California homeowners during the mortgage crisis tell a different story.

Last week Reuters published the other side of California’s housing recovery story with less than complimentary marks for Harris and Porter:

“Consumer advocates who worked with California homeowners during the mortgage crisis say the most vulnerable – limited English speakers, the disabled, widows and minorities – had the least luck obtaining relief.”

The article goes on to quote the deputy director of the California Reinvestment Coalition, an association of 300 nonprofit consumer finance groups that maintain that the people who were supposed to get loan modifications were not actually getting them.

We now know that not only did Porter’s multi-million dollar operation fail to track who applied for or received assistance under the settlement, but that Porter also failed to gather any meaningful information regarding ethnicity, income, disabilities, and family status. According to surveys seen by Reuters, credit counselors faced a considerable degree of difficulty obtaining assistance for disadvantaged groups.

Porter contends that 150,000 homeowners received some form of relief under the mortgage settlement in California but admits that at least half of the aid went towards short sales of people who still ended up losing their homes. This equates to $14 billion worth of settlement funds put towards short sales and second mortgages that reimbursed the big banks for money they would have lost without the settlement funds.

The Reuters article quotes nonprofit, advocacy leaders that contend that in essence Kamala Harris took her eye off of the ball once she handed this to Katie Porter and the results of Porter’s stewardship make it hard to tell who exactly was helped by the settlement besides the $14 billion that the big banks recovered from short sales.

According to OpenSecrets, a campaign finance watchdog group, Katie Porter’s political fundraising figures show a cozier relationship with Wall Street than her press releases portray. In her last campaign, Porter received nearly half a million dollars in campaign contributions from the Securities and Investment industry. Senator Kamala Harris’ records match Porter’s in that the fourth largest source of her campaign funds comes from the securities and investment industry totaling $798,677 in contributions, $5,475 of it coming from Wall Street-connected political action committees.

About Stephen Frank

Stephen Frank is the publisher and editor of California Political News and Views. He speaks all over California and appears as a guest on several radio shows each week. He has also served as a guest host on radio talk shows. He is a fulltime political consultant.

Comments

  1. CaliExpat says

    I like your feistier commentary since February, Stephen…

    Time to raise some hell….conservatives have been too quiet in CA, allowing liberals to own the narrative….

    Keep exposing their hypocrisy!!!

  2. Uncle Sam says

    Never liked or trusted that ugly fat bitch! Sounds like tweety bird, looks like Mama Cass! Her voice is like nails on a chalk board! SOS, can’t trust ANY democrat to just do their job without stealing from taxpayers!

  3. Damocles says

    And what about this is party specific ? It pretends that the only crooked , self serving parasites in government are Democraps. Plenty of this going on in BOTH parties.
    We need to put lawful Prison sentences back into Punishment for crooked Politicians . No more pretense that no one is above the law. Let’s walk the walk not just talk the talk.
    AMERICA FIRST .
    From the sword of—

  4. Bogiewheel says

    Congresswoman Porter is just another member of the Harvard/Yale clique. Porter, while attending Harvard Law School studied under the tutelage of the current U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren and received her Juris Doctor in 2001. One of Porter’s undergraduate thesis was titled:
    “The Effects of Corporate Farming on Rural Community” I have to admit
    that Congresswoman Porter has learned well, how to harvest a fruitful
    crop from the community.

  5. I like the word “negotiated”–that’s not a negotiation, that’s Xmas.

  6. Politicians should have to take a written test before being allowed to run for public office.

  7. askeptic says

    What’s the problem?
    Irvine’s voters (and those nearby) are too stupid to notice what she’s done, and too lazy to care.

  8. BornInCalifornia says

    Super confused, so people aren’t allowed to make money? Where in this article does it say that money was misappropriated? You imply it, but it looks like this is on pretty transparent and on the level. And it’s also implied that this is a huge sum of money, but you don’t actually say how much money Katie’s program saved or turned towards consumers (using the other 15 million they were charged with, which comparitive to 3 mil to staffing needs, seems like a fair amount not used for staffing even though you make it seem like a lot). You’re talking about the cost but never mention the actual benefits or supposed lack thereof of her tenure as monitor. Also, nothing in this article adds any information claiming this is out of the ordinary as far as salary or budget for this program, and doesn’t even mention if going over budget is normal or planned for, but you write it as if it’s criminal and abnormal.

Speak Your Mind

*