Will $1 Billion Spending on California’s Homeless Fix the Problem?

Government is predictable.  The more you spend on a “problem”, the bigger the problem gets.  Just look at the environmental issues.  The more government spends on studies and reports, the bigger the problem.  The phony report from USC earlier this year claiming, this is not a joke, that POLLUTION CAUSES TEENAGE OBESITY.  No, not eating too many French fries or cheesecake, nope climate change is causing obesity.  I bet you thought USC was a legitimate?   This is the school that gave us the abusive gynecologist, the massive bribery scandal and more.

Now we have billions being spent to get the homeless off the street and that problem has become worse.

“A recent report found that Los Angeles spent $619 million last year on the homeless crisis, but have little to show for it. Officials continue to claim that building housing for the homeless will solve the problem. However, not so long ago Los Angeles authorized the building of tiny homes for homeless.

But the tiny homes became tiny crack houses and heroin dens, as well as health hazards. Los Angeles Bureau of Sanitation officials then seized the tiny houses from homeless people in South Los Angeles, in a sweep of areas under freeways after finding needles, drug setups and even a gun.”

Give the government a problem and you make it worse.

Will $1 Billion Spending on California’s Homeless Fix the Problem?

Cities amassing grants and funding, while homeless populations only get worse

By Katy Grimes, California Globe,  5/14/19 

California has roughly 134,000 homeless people, amounting to one-quarter of the nation’s total homeless population.

The federal Housing and Urban Development agency published its 2018 report on homelessness which found more than 550,000 people are homeless in the United States. California and New York had the greatest numbers of homelessness and highest rates of homelessness, at 33 and 46 people per 10,000.

California’s largest cities are ground zero of the state’s expanding homeless population. Contrary to most city leaders’ claims that this is a housing problem, it is not that simple. While California’s housing costs are through the roof, many of those living on the streets are not even from California, but come here for the state’s liberal policies on drug use, easy theft opportunities and lack of criminal convictions, generous welfare benefits, as well as the “sanctuary” status – and the weather. Notably, most of the homeless also receive a monthly check from the federal government.

In Sacramento, California, the state’s Capitol, the homeless live in parks, in tents along rivers, on the streets and in alleys, and sleep at City Hall at night, after police were chastised for chasing them away.

The Homeless encampments along the sides of levees in Sacramento are now damaging the flood control structures, as some of the homeless dig into the slope to create a flat surface to put their tents up compromising the structural integrity of the levees, Tim Kerr, the general manager for the American River Flood Control District said in a Fox News report. Residents of the Sacramento region are justifiably nervous about levee breeches after two previous breaks in the levees in 1986 and 1995, causing extensive flooding.

Is There a Legislative Fix?

The California Legislature has made some attempts at fixes. And some legislative “fixes” only exacerbate the problem.

In 2018, the Legislature passed and Gov. Jerry Brown signed SB 1152 into law, requiring doctors in hospitals to provide homeless patients food, clothing and other services before discharging them, and then locating a shelter or home, or a social services provider. Homeless advocates said this was to stop hospitals from “patient dumping” — discharging patients to the streets after treatment, without a plan for additional services.

The Legislature has recently proposed several bills to stave off the expansion. Sen. Scott Wiener (D-San Francisco) authored Senate Bill 48, a “right to shelter” bill because of inconsistent access to shelters. “California’s housing crisis, along with our mental health and addiction challenges, are driving people into homelessness, and we must act,” said Sen. Wiener in a statement. “We must do more to ensure homeless people have access to shelter, as a way to stabilize people’s lives and help them transition to permanent housing.”

Sen. Wiener appears to grasp the problem in its complexity, and his bill may be an effective attempt to address this.

Another bill, Assembly Bill 46 by Assemblywoman Wendy Carillo (D-Los Angeles), would enact legislation “to replace derogatory terms with more culturally sensitive terms” when referring to individuals with mental illness – terms such as “insane” and “mental disorder.” It is unclear how this will effectively address the homeless crisis.

Gov. Gavin Newsom just proposed in his May Budget Revise $650 million in grants to homelessness agencies and local government to help fund  emergency shelters, housing assistance, and new construction. Combined with other existing programs, this adds up to $1 billion in spending on the homeless in the Golden State.

Will Housing Help?

A recent report found that Los Angeles spent $619 million last year on the homeless crisis, but have little to show for it. Officials continue to claim that building housing for the homeless will solve the problem. However, not so long ago Los Angeles authorized the building of tiny homes for homeless.

But the tiny homes became tiny crack houses and heroin dens, as well as health hazards. Los Angeles Bureau of Sanitation officials then seized the tiny houses from homeless people in South Los Angeles, in a sweep of areas under freeways after finding needles, drug setups and even a gun.

“Neighbors and other opponents, however, say they provide cover for lawlessness and criminal activity,” the Los Angeles Times reported. ‘They are only homes for prostitution, shooting up, smoking up,’ said June Ellen Richard, 54, who has lived all her life within blocks of one of the freeway overpasses where the tiny houses were parked.”

“The city spent $442 million from Proposition HHH last year developing homeless and affordable apartments, but none of the projects have opened yet and the wait for permanent housing has stretched to an average of 215 days,” the LAT reported recently. “Thus far, the city’s $77-million shelter expansion plan has produced two facilities, with room for 147 people.”

“LA county and city governments collectively spend an astonishing $1.1 billion annually on the costs of dealing with its growing homeless population,” Craig Powell of Eye on Sacramento wrote in 2017. Today it must be higher.

Tracking the grants and funding actually going to the homeless in California is becoming more and more difficult as local governments are creating non-profits to do this, where government agencies once managed the funds… and non-profits are not subject to the California Open Records Act.

About Stephen Frank

Stephen Frank is the publisher and editor of California Political News and Views. He speaks all over California and appears as a guest on several radio shows each week. He has also served as a guest host on radio talk shows. He is a fulltime political consultant.