Feds Insist On Rail Funds For CA Boondoggle

If it is built, California’s High-Speed Rail would be the largest public works project in state history. That fact alone appears be intoxicating to state officials, in a perpetual quest to have California be the first state to do anything.

Despite the warnings of a nearly $100 billion ballooning price tag, no track laid, no trains running, decreasing legislative support and even opposition from diehard rail advocates, the High-Speed Rail Authority is steaming ahead full throttle with plans to build the most expensive high-speed rail system in history.

But there is pushback coming from so many places that it must be difficult to keep up the cheerleading. Even the latest Field poll found that two thirds of Californians want a new referendum on the project. And by a two-to-one margin, they say they’d vote to derail it.

Many say that the plans will only unveil a state-subsidized train system, wrought with malfeasance, payola and unscrupulousness.

And even more question the need for another rail service, with Amtrack already operating throughout California. Others say that California already has high-speed travel — airplanes.

Kangaroo Court

The state legislative hearings with the High-Speed Rail Authority have become something of a bad joke. Legislators ask most of the right questions. They even ask the tough questions. However, High-Speed Rail Authority board members never answer the questions.

Assemblywoman Diane Harkey, R-Dana Point, has been asking where the money to build the rail system is going to come from. However, Harkey’s questions have also been ignored, by rail authority members who appear accountable to no one, particularly if they are not answering legislators’ questions.

Federal, State and Local Politics

Last week, U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood practically insisted that California take and use the $3.9 billion in federal money to build the Central Valley segment of High-Speed Rail. A hearing of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee was held to look at “mistakes and lessons learned” from President Barack Obama’s rail initiative. House Republicans were critical that the Obama administration mistakenly tried to push high-speed rail in the West, instead of the Northeast, where rail travel is already popular.

But the $3.9 billion offered to California was American Recovery and Reinvestment Act funds, federal stimulus money, and came with a requirement of use in the economically depressed Central Valley.

While the Central Valley is desperate for jobs of any kind, many in the region are welcoming High-Speed Rail with open arms.

“The fear is that they are going to use the federal funds anyway,” said Harkey. “But the High-Speed Rail Authority is not answering questions.”

Harkey recently attended the High-Speed Rail draft business plan presentation to the Orange County Transportation Authority board.

The OCTA addressed concerns with the rail authority, and called the funding plan “largely speculative,” and cost comparisons “theoretical.”

They were being kind.

Harkey said that she reiterated to the OCTA board that if a rail system is going to be built, High-Speed Rail needs to start in a more realistic location, such as Los Angeles to Anaheim, or San Jose to San Francisco. And she urged the OCTA board to “demand a new and independent ridership study.”

But Harkey also warned the OCTA that if they agreed to support the High-Speed Rail deal, there wouldn’t be any money for local transportation.  One of the funding sources the rail authority is counting on in the future is “cost sharing with local agencies.”

The other worry Harkey has is that the Legislature is not making any moves to take money away from the rail authority. “It’s the governor who wants this,” said Harkey. “I hope he will eventually realize that it’s got to stop.”

Many suspect that Gov. Jerry Brown is looking ahead with an eye toward Central Valley votes if he brings jobs to the region. But the untold story about High-Speed Rail jobs creation is that any construction jobs created by the rail project will be paid with borrowed money. The net effect will be financially negative.

The Emperor Has No Clothes

The state has no extra money for a brand new infrastructure project costing more than $100 billion before completion. California is facing a structural deficit of $35 billion.

The state ended last fiscal year with a cash deficit of $8.2 billion. And by next month, California will be facing an estimated $12 billion cash-flow deficit.

Long-term borrowing is even worse, and has grown from $60 billion to $90 billion over just the past four years. Harkey said that California is nearly maxed out of borrowing capacity and facing a credit downgrade.

A recent report by the Legislative Analyst found that future High-Speed Rail funding sources are “highly speculative,” and the economic impact analysis included in the rail authority’s plan “may be incomplete and imbalanced, and therefore portrays the project more favorably than may be warranted.”

And, congressional Republicans have refused to appropriate rail funds. Private investors, wherever they may be, are said to be demanding a revenue guarantee, which is yet another violation of the 2008 ballot measure.

Stating that its plan for the Central Valley portion of the rail line violates sections of Proposition 1A, a lawsuit filed against the High-Speed Rail plan contends that an operating subsidy will be needed for construction of the Central Valley segment. But an operating subsidy is outlawed under Prop. 1A. Complicating matters, the first segment of the rail system won’t even run high-speed trains until the entire system is build. The initiative required the train to be only high-speed.

Fact Versus Fantasy

At the hearing before Congress last week, LaHood said that California’s High-Speed Rail is “not a cheap project” but “the people in California want this.” But that’s not accurate given the recent Field poll results that found that 37 percent of voters who supported the High-Speed Rail bond measure in 2008 would vote against it today.

Calling the plan a “high-speed spending path,” Harkey said, “We can’t afford to accept the match funding from the federal government… match funds that will be repaid with tax bond dollars by our children. We don’t have a plan, we don’t have a route, and we don’t have the money to repay the costs.”

(Katy Grimes is CalWatchdog’s news reporter. Grimes is a longtime political analyst, writer and journalist. This article was first posted on CalWatchdog.)

Comments

  1. Levi Strauss says

    STUPID!!! STUPID!!! STUPID!!! STUPID!!! STUPID!!! STUPID!!! STUPID!!! STUPID!!! STUPID!!! STUPID!!! STUPID!!! STUPID!!! STUPID!!! STUPID!!! STUPID!!! STUPID!!! STUPID!!! STUPID!!! STUPID!!! and one more STUPID!!! And then on top of it all, a high speed rail from San Jose to SF or LA to Anaheim? You got to be kidding. They couldn’t even get up to speed. And the engineers couldn’t get off more then a couple dozen texts in that time. STUPID!!! STUPID!!! STUPID!!! STUPID!!! STUPID!!!

  2. This is just more dirty politics on the part of Obama to increase his election chances, when the rest of the country will have to pay for it. The election will have come and gone long before the people of California realize how improbable this project it. It hinges not on their money, but all taxpayer’s money. Would you put your neck in a hangman’s noose? If you wouldn’t, contact your Congressional Reps, and Senators, and force them to end Obama’s spending madness.

    • This is also another move to GIVE THE JOBS TO THE ILLEGALS! Let BHO donate all his money toward this insane project. I will write our liberal Congressional Reps – Feinstien,Boxer and Thompson —– Do you think it will do any good?
      It is so true- They care nothing about the money —It’s ours not theirs!

  3. Lionell Griffith says

    From the perspective of the advocates the whole point is to get to spend other people’s money and to push the payment for the costs as far into the future as possible (after their term in office). The worst possible outcome would be for it to be an economic success and more than pay for itself. If that were to happen, there would no longer be any excuse for spending other people’s money. You might even be expected to create another economic success with the profit. Where is the fun in that? Failure and deficit spending is the only acceptable option.

    The idea doesn’t rise to the level of being STUPID!!!

  4. Goes to show you how stupid can these politicians be. Build something that no one will ride, they don’t use the Amtrack now. Last ntime I used the Amtrack, yeah it was crowded and full , I counted 15 people in my car alone and about 80 people through out the train. The federal government has to subsidize it to keep it going.
    Well next election make sure those Democrats/liberal/socialists get voted in and we can have more and lots more of this waste. You will pay for it thru your taxes. But if your one of those UI (useful idiots) you will love it paying taxes.
    Oh yes, if you like this waste and want to comment of it wonderfulness, I suggest you start off with “Once-upon-a-time”

  5. They already have hi speed travel it is called air power. Brown screwed up Oakland into a la la city being their mayor. Dem’s never learn their lesson screw me once then screw us again that tells me Dem’s like to be screwed ( pun intended). Their should be a law once a governor that is it no more second term. Impeach this moron!!!

  6. Joel Whitehurst says

    The government is completely out of control, and there’s no more money to pay for their pork barrel spending. Their next step is to rob us with guns. I’m not kidding!!!

  7. ALL AMERICAN says

    Molon Labe

  8. reginald zenkewich says

    Governor Brownose should refuse this money from the Feds as it is a Train to nowhere. Why not use the Coast line that was intact back in the 60’s where one could travel from S. AC to the Oregon border, does this line still exist?

  9. The fact of the matter is that the train was to benefit SF to LA……not the towns in between……..the interest on most bonds is 12%, at that rate the principle will double every 7 1/2 years…..California could never afford their part of the project to begin with, especially with todays economy..

  10. ‘California’s High-Speed Rail would be the largest public works project in state history. That fact alone appears be intoxicating to state officials, in a perpetual quest to have California be the first state to do anything.’

    In that spirit, I earnestly propose and hope California be the first state in U.S. history to purge both the Assembly and Senate of the incumbant scourge by elections in two election cycles.
    GO! VOTERS GO! RAH! RAH! RAH!!!!
    DUMP THE REPS AND DEMS! SIS!!! BOOM!!! BAH!!!

    • That goes for perrenial staffers that cant be voted out because they are sought for their ‘years of invaluable inside Sacramento experience’. A part time government promises the best results!

  11. this is just nutz. enough is enough ,,,,,,.pay california’s deficit.before any thing else. the bitches can not even.balance a budget let alone build a train

    • “,,,,,.pay california’s deficit.before any thing else.”
      A balanced budget alone (sadly) is not the answer. A clean slate is just a green light for the next spending spree in the eyes of social progressives. Why let the wealthy keep the green stuff when you can redistribute it around?
      Any family with a recovering addict likely could tell you this.

  12. i am tired of all these happy go lucky idiots.come nov. i am all republican.

    • Oh the party of big government/big business is not that much better. At least with the Republicans, wrong thinking will NOT be punished.

  13. If the board will not answer the questions then replace them, or fire them. hire competent people. Real world companies hire people who can do the job, wouldn’ it been keen if the government tried that same think?

Speak Your Mind

*