Gov. Brown Will Decide Fate of Assisted Suicide Bill

Pills health careGov. Jerry Brown once again held the fate of a major legislative change in his hands. This time, a bill legalizing assisted suicide has landed on his desk.

After the Assembly greenlit the legislation 44-35, the state Senate cleared it with a 23-14 vote, CNN noted, bringing to a climax a controversy begun almost a year after the death of terminal brain cancer sufferer Brittany Maynard moved from California to Oregon in order to legally end her life before succumbing to the disease.

With passions running high on both sides, “Brown has not indicated where he stands on the issue, nor whether he will sign or veto the bill,” KQED reported. “If he does nothing, after 30 days the bill will become law.”

“If Gov. Jerry Brown signs the bill, California would become the fifth state to allow doctors to prescribe lethal medication to terminally ill patients who request it, after Oregon, Washington, Vermont and Montana.”

That, according to the New York Times, would triple the number of Americans who could successfully opt to go through with an assisted suicide. As is now routine with controversial California bills, supporters and opponents alike have suggested that Brown’s signature would set off a chain reaction of similar legislation around the country. Already, the Times added, over half the nation’s states “have put forward bills this year to legalize some kind of assisted suicide, according to the Death With Dignity National Center,” although as yet not one bill has made its way into law.

A second try

The bill, known by the special designation ABX2-15, followed in the wake of an effort that fell victim to objections focused on key members of the Assembly Committee on Health. Much like that bill, ABX2-15, introduced by Assemblywoman Susan Eggman, D-Stockton, “would allow some dying patients to end their lives through lethal doses of medication, as long as medication is self-administered; the patient is mentally competent; and two physicians confirm the prognosis that the patient has six months or less to live,” as California Healthline observed.

“Several amendments were added to the bill in the special session, including one that would require patients to reaffirm their consent within 48 hours prior to taking the lethal dose of medication. The bill’s authors also added an amendment that would sunset the law after a decade, making it effective only until Jan. 1, 2026, if passed. However, the state Legislature could vote to extend it.”

Reading the tea leaves

Observers looking for clues on Brown’s disposition noted that he has shown some dissatisfaction with the circumstances under which the legislation was advanced. As the Washington Times noted, “he has taken issue with moving the bill during the current special session, which is supposed to be focused on health care financing instead of the regular session.” Outside critics echoed Brown’s concern. “Californians Against Assisted Suicide spokesperson Tim Rosales said the bill was being rushed through the Legislature’s special session,” CNN reported.

Those opposed to the bill have placed their faith in Brown’s personal religious history. “Everybody’s interested because Jerry Brown’s a Catholic,” political analyst Allan Hoffenblum told the Times, referencing Brown’s well-known time in seminary.

Ongoing litigation

The development did not slow activists’ push for immediate change. In San Diego, the Fourth District Court of Appeal heard plaintiff Christy O’Donnell’s claim that the state should allow her to seek assistance in ending her life in advance of her death from lung cancer that has spread throughout her body. Through Attorney General Kamala Harris’s lawyers, the state countered that “long-standing California law in matters related to terminal illness” should not be swept aside, as the San Francisco Chronicle reported. Harris’s office further argued that O’Donnell’s request for accelerated review also be denied, according to the Chronicle, with the usual appellate process sometimes taking more than a year.

Originally published by


  1. Well Moonbeam, if you are going to allow the humane extinction of mainly older people, then I assume this will apply to the 700+ scumbags lounging around on “death row”. After all, the big hullabaloo over the death penalty was that it was not “humane” enough and those scumbags might suffer. But now they will all be executed, right Jerry?

  2. My only question is why is there any time limit at all. With some diseases you are in agony for years. For that matter why is it not legal to end your life any time you want to with or without help. If somebody wants to end their life it is nobodies business but there own and the means should be available.

  3. Anziani, you post a common sense solution to a growing problem. However consider that nothing has ever been reduced in California spending and it would leave thousands of government employees who are charged to pander to those death row inmates without justification for their salaries and at the same time possibly thousands of sufferers who are still on the tax rolls decide to bail out of the high cost of Kalifornia living. Since “Moonbeam” represents the epitome of Tax and Spend and needless government growth he may have a bit of a problem signing off on this one.

  4. Didn’t Moonbeam train with the Jesuits?
    I’m sure they will look kindly on his signing of this bill.
    And if he doesn’t sign it, the usual suspects in the Death Culture (The Left) will scream about the imposition of religion on government.

  5. Donald J, unfortunately you are right. What would we do with all of the “handlers” of the death row scum? Keep them on the payroll of course!

Speak Your Mind