Oroville Dam Spillway Cracking After $500 Million Repair

Oroville Dam 2The California Department of Water Resources acknowledged this week that many cracks have appeared in the new concrete of the Oroville Dam spillway, which cost over $500 million to repair.

The State of California is believed to have spent $100 million each month on Oroville Dam during February, March and April in a crisis effort to try to stabilize America’s tallest dam, which suffered a near collapse and forced the evacuation of 200,000 downstream residents earlier this year.

The Kiewit Corporation, which was issued a $275 million contract in April to repair both of Oroville Dam’s main and emergency spillways, poured a 1,700-foot cement top sheet and then roller-compacted and smoothed the spillway’s surfaces shortly before the November 1 contract deadline. The California Department of Water Resources (DWR) inspected the work and certified the first phase of the massive repair job was completed on time.

But the Sacramento Bee reported that cracks were first detected in September “when the first phase was nearing completion.” The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), which has federal oversight over the California owned dam, instructed DWR on October 2 to investigate “cracking of the erosion resistant concrete” on the repaired spillway and to recommend any further steps necessary to address infrastructure risks.

The California Division of Dams wrote a letter to FERC on November 7 to reassure regulators that “the presence of hairline cracks was anticipated and is not expected to affect the integrity of the slabs.” DWR spokeswoman Erin Mellon added, “All concrete has this result in the placement. It’s just physics of how concrete works.”

But KQED reported that Robert Bea, a professor emeritus of civil engineering and founderof the highly respected UC Berkeley Center for Catastrophic Risk Management, stated, “Cracking in high-strength reinforced concrete structures is never to be expected.” He added that when large volumes of water cascade down the spillway at speeds approaching 90 miles-per-hour, even small cracks could increase stresses on concrete.

The CCRM has issued several reports documenting that the state was aware of serious cracking in the Oroville Spillway as far back as a 1998 inspection report. DWR did try to patch some cracks and fill up visible voids. But CCRM dam experts stated that finding hollow areas is like trying to find a stud behind a wall by tapping it with a hammer.

Bea’s group is especially alarmed by green grass that has continued to grow on the dam’s abutments during the hot summer and fall. The lush green grass indicates there has been seepage through the dam face for about 50 years. CCRM does not accept DWR’s explanation that the seepage is not a risk, because it is just some “natural springs.” CCRM warns that any seepage through an earth-fill dam should be extremely worrisome.

This article was originally published by Brietbart.com/California

Comments

  1. No surprise here… Just wait until the “train to nowhere” boondoggle gets underway and never forget the huge cost overruns and questionable construction on the Bay bridge. But you have to understand that it is not the elected administrations fault, IT IS the Voters fault!

  2. Stephanie Hart says

    Big surprise! Can anyone out there tell me any engineering project or computer/tech project that State has undertaken over the past twenty years has been successful? Bay Bridge, high speed rail, court computer system . . . the hits just keep on coming.

  3. They need to build a Bullet Train for emergency evacuation.

    Can anyone tell me where the money that Brownie and his gang is that he was supposed to spend on dams etc.?

    And the people continue to vote for them.

  4. “Cracking in high-strength reinforced concrete structures is never to be expected”…….LACK OF THIS IS WHY THE SPILLWAY HAD TO BE REPAIRED…..The State, doing everything on the cheap; And the cheap way to fix this now is to spray the cracked surface with an industrial plastic so there is no “tooth” to catch the water flow. Did these State
    engineers graduate from the California school system ? As I recall the
    original spillway, from pictures I viewed, did not show rebar in the broken cement panels.

    • That’s what was initially suspected but close up shots of the broken slab chunks did reveal rebar sticking out of it. That claim was proven to be incorrect.

  5. What, you expected a spillway to be repaired any better than the roads?

  6. Does anybody in the California bureaucracy know how to write a contract with a guarantee clause. Oh well, what to expect with a bunch of numbskulls in the legislature.

Speak Your Mind

*