People that know me well know that I read. I read a lot. I read incessantly, I read everything and anything. I read everywhere, written by anyone, left, right or middle—it does not matter.
I long ago came to the conclusion that whether or not I agree with the points made by an author, this should not be the guiding principal of what I choose to read. I find that, in fact, I learn the most when I read things I do not innately agree with. In reading the contrasting opinions of others, and for the most part with the intent of maintain an open mind, I can try to compare their journey of understanding, expressed in their logic, if it exists, and either validate, or repudiate, parts of my own logic—hopefully, coming to a better understanding and opinion myself.
What’s the problem?
I am not so sure that this is what people really do anymore! It seems to me more and more people are only interested in letting someone else tell them what to think!
Recently, I have seen a series of articles, from both sides, trying to answer the question of what is wrong with our political system. Each side is spending lots of effort, and ink (or electronic bits), explaining how the system is not working because the other side is conspiring to subvert the system to harm something or someone, or to benefit something or someone at our expense. They often formulate the basic justification as this is clear because we are not getting what we want from the system.
Wrong Premise
The problem for me, as I see it, is the entire premise is wrong! By starting with the logic that something is wrong because we (pick either side in the argument) are not getting what we want, may be logical but it is not accurate on two levels. First, the assumption that the system is designed to give us something that we want in the first place, is not a correct assumption. Second, the idea that the system is designed so that whatever the majority wants is to be provided to us by the government is also not true.
System is working fine
The reality is that our political system is still, for the most part, working as it was designed despite the slow erosion of some of the original checks and balances over the past seventy-five years. If you doubt this premise, read any of the biographies of Washington, Adams, Jefferson, Monroe, or Franklin and it will quickly become quite obvious that this was the design.
No, the system is still working just as it was intended. The problem is not the system. Although, if we do not begin to understand the impact of the gradual changes we have made, soon this may not be the case. The problem with the system is we are now starting to get what we want, and compounding this problem we have been for the last fifty or sixty years. We are, in every corner, probably right or wrong, getting too much. No, it is not the system that is the problem it is:
- The changes we have allowed to be made to the original system have weakened the checks and balances on our own greed and avarice
- What we expect that we are due from the system has grown exponentially as we have gained more from the system
The system is being changed
Our system was designed to be based on part-time citizen politicians directly subject to the impact of the laws and policies they create, not a ruling elite political class exempt for their communities day to day trials and tribulations. At the very beginning of the implementation of our new form of government, in April of 1789, the grand design of our form of government showed the promise of its innate slow and difficult process to sort out where power and responsibility resides and to make difficult the ability of the federal government to pass laws that affect us. Rapidly, the two competing philosophies, which I believe are inherent in mankind, congealed into two political parties. The federalists, who advocated a strong federal government authority to foment consistency, rapid growth, and strength, became one pole, and the republicans, who were concerned about the rise of a tyrannical aristocracy or hereditary monarchy developing a predatory system reducing the rights and prosperity of citizens through taxes and needless, unwanted, regulations who advocated for government controls closer to the people at the state level.
While for over sixty years our education system has taught more, and more, that we are a democracy, and that we are by nature a nation where it is the majority that rules, this was specifically and unequivocally not the government that the founders created. We were, and to some extent remain, a constitutional republic. The difference is; in a democracy people have a direct control through their vote, and in a constitutional republic the control is indirect through the election of officials who are supposed to weigh the will of the people against what is best for the country and consistent with the constitutional republican principals of our government as they make law and policy.
System is still fine—For Now!
Today we are clearly migrating away from some of these fundamental principals in two areas:
- We now, as a people, no longer understand the benefits of the constitutional republic and many if not most simply believe we are a democracy, and
- We have inadvertently allowed the creation of a stronger federal control by stimulating the creation of a full-time professional political class—potentially, just the kind of tyrannical aristocracy that Jefferson and Madison were so worried about at the beginning of America.
The question we all need to answer is: is this what we agree we truly need? If so, then we will have to accept the consequences of a pandering democratic machine continually taking prosperity from the individuals and granting it to the majority in exchange for the continuation of their livelihood as a full-time professional politician and the continual erosion of the original system of government and its checks and balances.
If this is not what we agree we need then there are some very had choices and changes we will need to consider to recover the checks and balances and once again return to the constitutional republican form of government we had.
Still up to us to define our system for a while longer
The good thing is it is still up to us for a bit longer. The more we continue the erosion of the checks and balances inherent in our original constitutional republic, the more we become a democracy. At some point we will slip beyond the edge and soon perhaps there will be no going back short of another costly and divisive civil war.
And the answer is?
So the answer to the question that headlines this article, “What is wrong with Politics?” is nothing at the moment, but stay tuned!
(Tom Loker served as the Chief Operating Officer of Ramsell Holding Corporation. Prior to joining Ramsell, Mr. Loker was the founder and senior partner of Wild Tiger Holding Company and Thomas Loker Consulting. Visit his website at www.loker.com and his blog at tloker.wordpress.com.)
What is Wrong with Politics: People that know me well know that I read. I read a lot. I read incessantly… http://t.co/aFgGeMq7 #tcot
Great observations and conclusions. The second to last paragraph really summerizes the the result of letting erosion to our once great system progress to this point.
Well one problem we over look is Vetting our politicans in depth, make them more “Transparent”. We should look closer onto their lives and intensions, perhaps we should have it in writting as to what they are going to do and hold them to it (a Contract for office) with the penalty of termination of office. Or better yet give them three strikes and their out. Enough of their lying and scheming to enrich themselves and friends. Another thing is to ban the Lobbying. I think that this a great sourse of this corruption. All the laws appear to benefit “special interests ” groups. what about the people, only token efforts for us.
Nothing is wrong with politics? I disagree. The current direction of politics is the political elite working to get other people to pay for the whims of some select few people. This is nothing but wrong.
If you want something, PAY FOR I YOURSELF! My life and my wealth are not yours to take and redistribute according to your whims no matter how many of you there are nor how serious you think your need is. I created the wealth and it is therefor mine. I don’t care who you are and what your pretense of justification is. It is wrong!
As long as the political system assumes all wealth is its to redistribute, politics is as evil as it can be. There is no such thing as being a little bit evil. The evil, no matter how small is TOTAL!
A simple idea make it a requirement to have 75% to pass any law. If you can’t get 75% of the people to agree it is a good idea than it probably should not be passed. Make it 50% to repeal a law. If after it passed 1/2 the people don’t like it, it probably should be repealed.
Without meaning to sound sanctimonious, I think we’ve got the government we deserve: we don’t stay married, we don’t raise or educate our own kids, we don’t value modesty or chastity, we don’t worship our Creator (and many of us don’t believe even believe in one), we don’t love our neighbors as ourselves, or do unto others as we’d have them do unto us. And that’s just a few of the basics we can’t seem to manage. Why should our government be any better than it is? When we don’t behave any better than animals, we should expect to be herded or hunted and used as such. I think we need to work on ourselves and our government will follow.
If there’s nothing wrong with politics, how come we have an arguably crooked lawyer, whose family has received millions of dollars in “speaking fees” from middle-eastern moslem potentates, representing “America’s” interests, as Secretary of State, in sensitive negotiations with the same guys who repeatedly bribed her husband, a disbarred Arkansas attorney? I wouldn’t hire either one of the clintons to represent my tiny business for fear that, with their history, they would rip me off! They are considered to be members of the U.S. political elite! Nothing wrong with politics? That ridiculous premise is not worthy of serious consideration!
Mr. Loker you are correct, kinda.
It is not the political class that is hurting the Republic so much as it is the people who do not understand what our Republic stands for. Maybe if we taught just the preamble to the constitution in school and made sure that everyone understood what these words actually mean to the citizen of the nation.
The Liberal Socialists, now known as Progressives, have over time convinced those who are uneducated in the meaning of the words in our constitution that somewhere in those words there is a word that means that the government will allow the majority of the people to vote to confiscate the property of the minority of the people and use that property for any purpose desired.
In fact we have now elected a supposed Constitutional Scholar who pushes this concept daily in every speech he makes. This clown supposedly studied the Constitution and later taught it in Chicago, how many people has he fed this redistribution of wealth crap to we do not know. But, the Constitution was designed to protect the life, liberty and property of every citizen of the Nation.
I think it is time for our educational institutions to start teaching the history of this nation and all of our founding documents the way they are written. Maybe, just maybe, we will turn out some real Patriots from our schools instead of the feel good give me, give me types we now produce.
So I’m guessing you support the return to a part time legislature? Interesing.