Well, that was awkward.
Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to subscribe!Gov. Gavin Newsom stalled for weeks on attending last week’s global conference on climate change in Glasgow, then announced at the last moment that he would, only to just as suddenly announce that he wouldn’t “due to family circumstances” which were never explained.
Instead, Lt. Gov. Eleni Kounalakis led a couple of dozen administration officials and legislators to the conference, and they were largely confined to the sidelines.
Newsom’s last-minute decisions stymied California reporters who had planned to cover his performance on the international stage, because they came too late to apply for press credentials.
Journalists could only monitor from afar, which rendered California’s tertiary participation to almost a non-event, from a news standpoint.
Kounalakis told CalMatters reporter Emily Hoeven, who had planned to accompany Newsom to Glasgow: “The overall message is the strength of California’s subnational leadership and the power of our innovation economy to help the world scale up on climate solutions.”
Kounalakis took that message to one of the panel discussions in which she participated, saying that “California has been the tail that has wagged the dog on environmental protection.” She cited Newsom’s order to ban the sale of gasoline-powered cars by 2035, contending that “We are the largest consumer market in the United States, and this standard is most certainly already shaping the future.”
Having the lieutenant governor travel all that way, by hydrocarbon-powered transport at no small expense, to merely echo what Newsom has been saying for the past three years was pretty lame.
That said, it’s high time that Newsom put some meat on the bones of his sweeping promises that California will lead humankind into a brave new hydrocarbon-free future.
If California is to ban sales of gasoline-powered cars in the next 14 years, how will it be done? While California leads the nation in the sale of battery-powered vehicles, they still are only a tiny percentage of overall auto purchases.
Will California have an adequate infrastructure of charging stations? Will it even have enough electrical power available for charging, given that it sometimes cannot meet current demand during hot summer days?
Simultaneously, Newsom wants to eliminate all power generation from natural gas and other hydrocarbon sources, so what’s the plan for that conversion? Can we develop enough solar and wind power to meet all demands for juice?
What will we do when the sun doesn’t shine and the wind doesn’t blow? We would need immense banks of batteries or other storage facilities to take up the slack. Will there be enough lithium to construct those batteries without depending on other nations?
Support nonprofit journalism in California
We rely on your generous support to cover the stories that matter most to you. If you find our work valuable in these difficult times, please support our journalism.ONE-TIMEMONTHLY$10$15$25OtherANNUALLY
Your contribution is appreciated.DONATEI’M NOT INTERESTED.
Newsom also wants to stop oil and gas production in the state by 2045? Where are the details and how will the impacts on the petroleum industry’s thousands of workers — in the fields, in the refineries and in the gas stations — be mitigated?
If California is to be hydrocarbon-free in just a few decades, will that mean banning diesel-powered ships from California’s ports and jet planes from the state’s airports? Will we even have airports anymore?
If we can no longer buy gasoline-powered lawnmowers and other tools, how will we do the work they now perform? Will homes, hospitals, schools and other vital buildings be left without backup power from standby generators when the grid goes down? Will firefighters no longer have chain saws and bulldozers to battle wildfires?
These are serious questions and issuing sweeping decrees without telling us how hydrocarbons will be eliminated and what the effects will be on our lives is political malpractice.
OK, as I have said before…. if this is what you want get rid of ALL products that have a hydrocarbon backbone. Computers, phones, lighting, most if not all of your cloths, oh did I mention your vaunted electric cars…..!
Geo scientist from Greenland did extensive glacial ice examinations. They found the current weather is the tail end of an abnormal cold phase in world weather. They also stated most of their glaciers were melting from the bottom because of volcanic activity. Oh did I mention they also found more carbon in the air trapped in the ice during the cold snap?
But wait if you get rid of TV, cable, and radios how will the dictators of Newsom’s party pass out false and misleading information? (you know like idiot Waters)
Think about it. Going back to yard and ag. work by hand tools with wood and metal construction. No rubber tires so the trucks of ag. will be towed by horses, and use wooden spoke wheels (head’m up … move’m out)
I know how about the production of “environmentally friendly” non-toxic floor treatments and such? Most of that comes from the hydrocarbon industry……
There is only on thing more stupid then the Radicalized Communist Left called Democrats…..the mule pulling the wagon now that back to the future is a stupid plan.
Just what do these idiots think their yachts use and planes fly on? And their limos, unicorn farts? Plus their beloved rotary bird slicers require 80 gallons of synthetic lubricant each year and that takes 12,000 gallons of oil to make. whoops The devil is in the details