Citing ‘financial risk,’ UC pledges to divest from fossil fuels

The UC system runs its own pension system.  Those running it have a fiduciary responsibility to the member’s and retirees.   When they fail, the taxpayers are on the hook to pay the pensions.  Those running the system have decided politics and ideology are more important that caring about going broke.

“In what is already shaping up to be a banner week for climate policy watchers, the University of California on Tuesday announced it will divest its $83 billion in endowment and pension funds from the fossil fuel industry, a move that could send ripple effects throughout higher education nationally.

The decision — which coincides with a worldwide strike planned for Friday and the Trump administration threatening California’s auto emissions standards — caps a multi-year campaign by students and faculty who argued the university had a responsibility to address climate change.

UC officials, however, said they made it for financial reasons.

“This is the biggest single commitment by any educational institution in the world and it represents a true watershed.”

Yes—it will be an education.  The system will lose money and retirees will have to worry about their pension check.  Will they learn from the almost bankrupt CalPERS and CalSTRS that for years have  been using politics to invest—and losing billions in the process.  The taxpayers have financed keeping the doors open to both systems due to the corruption of those in charge.

Citing ‘financial risk,’ UC pledges to divest from fossil fuels

Felicia Mello,  CalMatters,  9/17/19 

In Summary

With a worldwide strike planned for Friday and the Trump administration threatening California’s auto emissions standards, the University of California said renewable energy offers “more attractive investment opportunities.” 

In what is already shaping up to be a banner week for climate policy watchers, the University of California on Tuesday announced it will divest its $83 billion in endowment and pension funds from the fossil fuel industry, a move that could send ripple effects throughout higher education nationally.

The decision — which coincides with a worldwide strike planned for Friday and the Trump administration threatening California’s auto emissions standards — caps a multi-year campaign by students and faculty who argued the university had a responsibility to address climate change.

UC officials, however, said they made it for financial reasons.

“This is the biggest single commitment by any educational institution in the world and it represents a true watershed.”

“We believe hanging onto fossil fuel assets is a financial risk,” chief investment officer Jagdeep Singh Bachher and Richard Sherman, chair of the university regents’ investment committee, wrote in an opinion piece published in the Los Angeles Times

They added that there were “more attractive investment opportunities” in new energy sources — presumably renewables, where UC has pledged to direct $1 billion in funding by 2020.

Climate activists celebrated UC’s announcement, though a few cautioned that some details of the plan remain unclear. 

“This is the biggest single commitment by any educational institution in the world and it represents a true watershed,” said Bill McKibben, author and founder of the environmental group 350.org, adding that he expected other universities to follow suit.

The university’s faculty senate sent a memorandum to regents in July urging divestment. UC says it will make the change in phases, starting with the university’s endowment by the end of the month and moving on to the larger pension funds at an unspecified time.

One unanswered question: exactly how the university will define a fossil fuel asset. UC currently invests about $150 million in the top 200 publicly-traded coal, oil and gas companies, Baccher said at Tuesday’s board of regents meeting. Divestment will not be limited to those companies, however, UC spokesman Stett Holbrook said. “We have developed a more comprehensive, custom list,” he said in an email to CalMatters.

At the meeting, Baccher also credited student activism for raising his awareness about the issue. “The students were the first early warning system for us,” he said.

UC had previously divested from coal and tar sands, and committed to becoming carbon-neutral by 2025. “The UC has taken cautious steps,” said Emily Williams, a PhD student in geography at UC Santa Barbara active in the campaign. “Each time they’ve added a little bit more.”

Students at the university have a history of successful divestment campaigns, agitating for the pulling of funds from apartheid-era South Africa and, more recently, private prisons. 

Tuesday’s announcement also comes at a time of heightened climate activism, with young people around the world—led by crusading Swedish teenager Greta Thunberg—set to walk out of school in a coordinated climate strike Friday, ahead of the United Nations Climate Action Summit.

“Divesting from all fossil fuel companies turns the climate problem into something that seems like a simple problem, and in fact it’s the opposite.”

Divestment as a strategy, however, is not without its critics. Some climate experts argue that while fossil fuel companies derail many efforts to reduce emissions, some of them nevertheless must play a role in any transition to a low-carbon future.

“Divesting from all fossil fuel companies turns the climate problem into something that seems like a simple problem, and in fact it’s the opposite,” said David Victor, a professor at UC San Diego’s School of Global Policy and Strategy who studies climate regulations. He cited efforts by European oil and gas companies to develop carbon capture technology and hydrogen pipelines.

“We should be shareholders in those companies, and we should be active shareholders, to make sure that they’re actually doing it,” he said. 

But Leah Stokes, a UC Santa Barbara political science professor who supported the divestment drive, said its symbolism was important in a country still struggling to come to terms with the climate crisis. 

“I think the broader issue is about eroding fossil fuel companies’ social license to operate,” she said. “The real power from the divestment movement comes from standing up and saying the fossil fuel era needs to come to an end.”

About Stephen Frank

Stephen Frank is the publisher and editor of California Political News and Views. He speaks all over California and appears as a guest on several radio shows each week. He has also served as a guest host on radio talk shows. He is a fulltime political consultant.