Eric Holder hired to “fight Trump” – San Fran Chronicle does not provide whole story

attorney-general-eric-holderWhen President Obama worked to pass the Affordable Care Act, the state of California did not hire a Washington attorney to fight for this legislation. As Obama was issuing the Dream Act, amnesty for illegal aliens, the state Legislature did not hire a Washington attorney to demand, at a $25,000 a month retainer, to use his office to overturn a vote of Congress for the amnesty. Sacramento has given the 38 million people of California some of the toughest, and least enforced, gun laws possible. The hacks of the Capitol were “so successful” that 1.3 million new guns were sold in the state in 2016.

Yet, the San Francisco Chronicle reported in an article on January 15, 2017, that the state of California, via the Democratic supermajority in the Legislature, has hired a Washington, D.C., attorney to “fight” for California:

“California lawmakers are bracing for a fight against soon-to-be President Trump and top officials in his administration who have said they will push for policy and legal changes that would threaten several of the state’s progressive laws.

From immigration to gun control to environmental protections, the state finds itself at odds with Trump, who will be sworn in as the 45th president of the United States on Friday. One of the biggest tools the federal government has is control of the purse strings. California is expected to receive $105 billion in federal dollars in the upcoming fiscal year, which includes $78 billion for various health and human services. The new administration, and the Republican-controlled Congress, can reward — and punish — states with the way it distributes federal dollars.

To prepare for any battles, the Legislature has hired a Washington, D.C., law firm headed by former U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder.”

So, to get these “progressive policies” in the past, the California government used its 53 members of Congress, its two U.S. Senators, 80 Assembly members, 40 State Senators, the governor, the attorney general and the 1,600 attorneys in that office, along with the numerous state agencies.

Now that Donald Trump is to be the president, politicians in Sacramento, using tax dollars, have decided to hire a gun-runner, a former attorney general that authorized the sale of assault weapons to the Mexican drug cartels, to represent us in Washington. It is as if none of the thousands already being paid to do the job of representing us no longer exist. This has a smell of a political payoff rather than the hiring of an attorney.

Assemblyman Kevin Kiley, though a freshman, has figured it out and why this is wrong. “In a letter to the opinion unit of the state attorney general’s office, the Rocklin Republican and former deputy attorney general argued that hiring Holder as outside counsel violates Article VII of the California Constitution. Kiley said California courts have interpreted that section ‘as forbidding private contracting for services that are of a kind that persons selected through civil service could perform ‘adequately and competently’ ” – such as “assisting in defending California against federal actions,” a function of the attorney general.

“In light of these facts, I respectfully ask your legal opinion as to whether the 1,592 attorneys and legal staff at the State Attorney General’s Office can perform ‘adequately and competently’ the legal services for which Covington & Burling has been retained by the Legislature,'” Kiley wrote in a letter to the Attorney General’s Office.

Most headlines in the Times, Chronicle and Bee noted that Holder was hired “to fight” Donald Trump. Is that the role of the Legislature, to fight a president because they do not like him? Is that the proper use of tax dollars, when we have homeless, affordable housing, pension and a water crisis? The state of California has a close to a $2 billion planned deficit, yet the Democrats in the Legislature refuse to use current assets to hire an attorney with no credibility in a town with a Republican president, Congress and Senate? Even if this was a needed hire, the person hired is known as being ethically challenged. He lied to a court and got caught, using his office for political purposes.

From Techdirt, October 30, 2014:

“Holder was asked if there was a decision during his tenure that he regretted, and he brought up the Rosen story:

Holder: I think that — I think about the subpoena to the Fox reporter, Rosen. I think that I could have been a little more careful in looking at the language that was contained in the filing that we made with the court. He was labeled as a — as a co-conspirator. I mean, you had to do that as a result of the statute, but there are ways in which I think that could have been done differently, done better. And that’s one of the reasons why I thought the criticism that we received because of that — and the AP matter as well — was something that we had to act upon and why we put in place this review of our — the way in which we interact with the media.

Except, as Julian Sanchez points out, that’s completely bogus. Holder claiming they had to do that because of the statute is flat out opposites-ville. They had to do that because the statute doesn’t allow them to spy on journalists. The law was designed to stop the DOJ from spying on journalists, and so the only way to break that was to lie to the court. The law in question — 18 USC 793 is designed to only apply to the people actually committing the crime of leaking defense information — and not to reporters.”

Yes, not only did Holder lie to a court — he used his office to illegally spy on journalists.  Plus on other occasions he lied to Congress.

None of this was part of the Chronicle story — other than California is angry with the results of the elections and does not like it that Trump appears to be willing to keep his campaign promises. And, the fact, California taxpayers have been forced to hire one of the least likely people in Washington to get past the receptionist. The San Francisco Chronicle has a responsibility to fully explain the story. By leaving out who Holder really is and his record, it denies the readers of being able to make a judgement that the decision was good or bad.

Is this a man you would want pleading your case in Washington starting January 20, 2017? It is not California vs. Trump. It is Sacramento vs. California. And the Democrats have a supermajority. What could you do with $25,000 a month?

Stephen Frank is editor of the California Political News and Views section of California Political Review. 

Comments

  1. retiredxlr8r says

    Holder is from the same mold as Obama.
    Deceive and lie because the “…end justifies the means…”
    Never mind integrity, honor, and what is right.
    California’s legislature has proven they are bad managers of California’s resources and have no intention of correcting the problem or their ways.
    California is the incubator for the nation of everything that is wrong in our nation. In example, diversity and debt, two attributes that will utterly destroy California and the Nation, we are either one People or not and we have wisdom about our finances or not.
    Looks like California comes down on the “NOT” side.
    We lose and in the process will drag the Nation down with us.
    Pessimistic I know, but what comes out of Sacramento and the daily headlines seem to back me up.

  2. Held in contempt of Congress & as a CA taxpayer, I hold him in contempt; along with the political class in this State (of Insanity).

  3. Janet Zwahlen says

    FAST & FURIOUS —REMEMBER THAT ONE? now connect the dots. This is a well intrenched activist- criminal from Chicago ready to do all he can to destroy our culture -He’s linked to BHO who is criminal islam-nOW GO FIGURE!

  4. Dixie Van Horst says

    What a horrible choice for CA and to think that Gov Brown spent money (that CA doesn’t have) to hire this person. So sad

  5. DR Richard Muccillo says

    He will be removed along with cronies and baldy woodpecker nose brown

  6. Expectingbetter says

    The hiring of Eric Holder is another step taken by Jerry Brown and the Progressive, Liberal Democrats that will bankrupt California in due time. The old saying “don’t mine the mules just load the wagon” will come crashing down when all of the businesses leave California and all that is left is a Government with no taxpaying mules.

    • JeeBs Satanic (radical) disposition for macabre is typical Jesuit Sabbatean/Frankist delivery on his lifetime solidarity pledge the latter of which he magnified to 6 infant deaths per 1000 vaccinated via his medically assisted child sacrifice vax mandate, SB227. Thisxdevil is leavung office doing HIS retention sacrifices prequel. Regarding the California public, you can’t fix stupid.

  7. Suitable creepy atty for like minded state legislature. They groom these freams from birth. What I can’t figure out is how they determine low inteligence at deluvery to qualify for a lifetime debauchery handler.

  8. @Moderator. Please remove immediately preceding post re typos.

    Suitable creepy atty for like minded state legislature. They groom these freaks from birth. What I can’t figure out is how they determine low inteligence at delivery to qualify for a lifetime debauchery coach.
    reply

  9. Do not ask what other laws Jerry Brown and his merry band of Democrat cohorts can violate. The California constitution succinctly states: THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION IS THE LAW OF THE LAND. Jerry is trying to act like he is unaware of this.

  10. This is a thoroughly corrupt State, and the fix is in–only a tiny number of conservatives can be elected due to gerrymandering of the conservative Eastern part of the State. What is scary is this movement to secede California, which is growing, so that it can’t be adversely affected by Trump’s policies. The rest of the country (save NY, Oregon, Washington and the Northeast) would be happy to see California’s rampant “progressive” policies and a virtually totalitarian regime (no tolerance for any viewpoints other than progressive ones, with severe penalties for dissidents) excised like a cancer from the Union.

Speak Your Mind

*